No Evidence of Human Evolution in 30,000 Years

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pakbabydoll
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evolution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights that there has been no significant evolutionary change in humans over the past 30,000 years, a period considered relatively short in evolutionary terms. While evolution is a slow process, evidence of evolution can be observed in other species, such as antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which can evolve rapidly due to their short generation times. The concept of "high fitness" is introduced, suggesting that species may remain stable over long periods if their environment does not change significantly. Sharks are cited as an example of a species that has remained largely unchanged for millions of years. Additionally, it is noted that human evolution has been influenced by environmental modifications made by humans themselves, which can limit natural selection. The ability of humans to travel and interbreed across diverse climates further complicates traditional evolutionary processes.
Pakbabydoll
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
They have not found any major evolution is humans for nearly 30,000 years... I know it is a very slow process but 30,000 years is not enough for a little some thing to happen so we can prove that evolution is real?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
You can find a lot of evidence for evolution without investigating humans. Antibiotic resistant bacteria is one example.
 
If the average human generation is 20 years, 30,000 years is 1500 generations. Since bacteria reproduces every 20 minutes, 1500 generations is only 20 days.
 
When a species has high fitness, it may not change much over long periods, if the environment does not change.
 
jim mcnamara said:
When a species has high fitness, it may not change much over long periods, if the environment does not change.

Just in order to illustrate this point, look at sharks. They have remained basically the same for millions of years.

If you look at adaptations prior to this period, you'll see that the human brain doubled in size in a fairly short period of time.
 
Keep in mind that for quite a lot of time, rather than the environment selecting for human fitness, humans have been modifying their environment to suit their current traits. This is going to limit the impact of typical selection processes in humans. Those adapted to cold, northern climates are not prevented from traveling and interbreeding with those adapted to hot, equatorial climates (they can just get on an air-conditioned plane and go there).
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
63
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top