No Solution for 3x+2y=7 in Real Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter relyt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the logical interpretation of the statement regarding the equation 3x + 2y = 7. The original statement suggests that there exists an x in the real numbers such that for all y in the real numbers, the equation holds true. The proposed negation is that for every x in the real numbers, there exists a y such that the equation does not hold. Participants confirm that the interpretation and negation are correct, affirming the logical structure of the statements. The conversation highlights the complexities of reading mathematical notation and the importance of precise language in logic.
relyt
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Statement:

(\exists_{x} \in R) (\forall_{y} \in R) (3x + 2y = 7)

Trying to find negation statement. This is what I think it is:

(\forall_{x} \in R)(\exists_{y} \in R) (3x + 2y ≠ 7)


Is this close?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm having trouble reading this notation, but I'm assuming the first statement says "There exists an x in R such that for all y in R, 3x + 2y = 7."

To make this backwards, we would need to say, "For each x in R, there exists a y in R such that 3x + 2y does not equal 7," so if I have interpreted your notation correctly, I think your answer is correct.
 
Thanks, phreak. Yes, that is how it should read.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top