No Solution for 3x+2y=7 in Real Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter relyt
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
relyt
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Statement:

([tex]\exists_{x} \in[/tex] R) ([tex]\forall_{y} \in[/tex] R) (3x + 2y = 7)

Trying to find negation statement. This is what I think it is:

([tex]\forall_{x} \in[/tex] R)([tex]\exists_{y} \in[/tex] R) (3x + 2y ≠ 7)


Is this close?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm having trouble reading this notation, but I'm assuming the first statement says "There exists an x in R such that for all y in R, 3x + 2y = 7."

To make this backwards, we would need to say, "For each x in R, there exists a y in R such that 3x + 2y does not equal 7," so if I have interpreted your notation correctly, I think your answer is correct.
 
Thanks, phreak. Yes, that is how it should read.