Non central potential and energy dependence

naruto365
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Could anyone tell me where can i find more about the fact that if your Hamiltonian is non-central then the total energy is not dependent only on principle quantum number n but also on l.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your Hamiltonian is not spherically symmetric, then l is not a good quantum number in the first place: If H does not commute with rotations, you cannot find a common eigensystem of H and the L^2 operator[1].

I guess what you mean is "why is the energy dependent on n and l for for spherical potentials which are not 1/r" (i.e., not hydrogen). If this is the case: Because there generally is no reason for all energy to be independent of l. Rather, this degeneracy in the hydrogen atom is a special case for 1/r potentials, ultimately related to a hidden additional conserved symmetry (the so called Runge-Lenz-Vector already known from classical mechanics). So it is the 1/r potential which is the special case, not the other ones.[1] of course you could still prepare a wave function in a specific l state with respect to some point, but such states would not be eigenstates.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
6K
Back
Top