Non-Hausdorff spaces by John L. Bell.

  • Thread starter Thread starter sutupidmath
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Non-Hausdorff spaces are less studied compared to Hausdorff spaces, primarily serving as counter-examples in topology. Their properties make them more relevant to set theory than to topology, as they lack the desirable characteristics found in Hausdorff spaces. These spaces often arise in algebraic geometry and are associated with problems requiring compactness, which conflicts with the separation properties of Hausdorff spaces. Examples include the cofinite and Zariski topologies, which are significant in various mathematical fields. Resources such as "Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker's Guide" provide insights into their applications in modern analysis and logic.
sutupidmath
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
4
Hi,

Since i will not be asking for assistance in a particular problem, i am posting under "General Math" rather than "Topology". If inappropriate, please move it somewhere else.

As the title suggests, i am interested in reading more about Topological spaces that are NOT Hausdorff, but there seem to be very little on this topic out there, at least compared to what i was able to find about Hausdorff spaces.

So, i was wondering whether you could provide me with some sources, like articles, books etc. that talk exclusively about non-Hausdorff spaces. I have been able to find a few things, but i was wondering whether there is something more in depth.


Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You probably won't find much. "Non-Hausdorf" spaces are not very interesting- they are used mainly as "counter-examples" to show exactly why Hausforf is needed in so many theorems.
 
The study of non-Hausdorff spaces properly belongs to set theory, not topology. They just don't have enough nice properties to use topological notions.
 
The spaces studied in algebraic geometry are typically non-Hausdorff...
 
Non-hausdorff topologies occur mostly when you are dealing with problems that demand compactness, but this is incompatible with a strong separation property like Hausdorff's.

Look, for example, at the cofinite and Zarisky topologies; these arise naturally in algebra and algebraic geometry.

In analysis, these topologies also appear when you want to talk about, for example, upper (or lower) semicontinuity of functions; these are the functions that are continuous relative to the topology on \mathbb R, generated by the half-open intervals; it is strictly weaker than the standard one and it's not hausdorff. These are important in the modern theories of variational calculus, non-linear analysis and set-valued functions (with applications to game theory and mathematical economics). One note: most textbooks in these fields hide the fact that they are working with a weaker topology by defining upper and lower semicontinuity in terms of upper and lower limits of sequences. But you could take a look at:

Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker's Guide 3d ed, Aliprantos and Border, Springer, 2006.

Another area where NHT are used is in some of the categorial formulations of logical systems, but Hurkyl could probably tell you much more about these than I. Nevertheless, you may want to take a look at:

http://books.google.pt/books?id=9Hh...esnum=3&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=&f=false"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
704
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top