Non homogeneous density in a gas

AI Thread Summary
In discussions about non-homogeneous density in gases, it is noted that traditional equations like the Van der Waals equation assume constant density, which may not be justified. The average density of gas in a microcanonical volume can vary based on factors such as wall interactions and gravitational effects. It is suggested that particles may cluster near walls or the bottom of a container, particularly when energy exchange occurs. The Boltzmann distribution indicates that, under equilibrium conditions, the number density remains constant, but this does not account for potential density variations in real scenarios. The radial distribution function is highlighted as a crucial concept for understanding these density variations in non-ideal gases.
JamesWolf
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, have searched around but can't find what I am looking for (probably because I am not entirely certain what its called)

An elemental gas in a contained volume, say microcanonical for simplicity, will have atoms that bounce against the walls. Is there an equation for the average density of the gas with respect to position?

Everywhere I see (such as Van der Walls equation) presumes a constant density across the volume. Is this simplification justified? Or do atoms on average hang by the walls, or in the middle?
Presumably in a more complicated system, gravity included, they hang closer to the bottom. If we allow energy exchange between the walls and the gas, will this average position change? Speed is related to the temperature kT, is this position also?

Pointing me in the right direction on this will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See section 3.5: http://www.pma.caltech.edu/Courses/ph136/yr2011/1103.1.K.pdf

Clearly from eq. (3.37a) if the gas (which may consist of multiple components) is at equilibrium, meaning constant temperature and constant chemical potential, then the number density is also constant.

This is reasonable. Eq. (3.37a) is derived assuming the particles are non-relativistic, classical, free particles so that their occupation number obeys the Boltzmann distribution ##\mathcal{N} = \frac{g_s}{h^3}e^{(\mu - p^2/2m)/k_B T}## and as such, given the isotropy and lack of interactions of significant time scales (meaning collisions don't matter) there is no reason there would be overdense regions and underdense regions of the gas in the volume.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for answering me, ill have a read of the pdf :)
 
JamesWolf said:
Pointing me in the right direction on this will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
See, radial distribution function.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radial_distribution_function

In general, it depends on what you want to do, but no the assumption is often not justified. Infact, to get the van der waals equation one has to enforce homogeneous density. As the radial distribution function corresponding to a van der waals gas is not the same as for an ideal gas, the assumption is not exactly right and one can easily show the true density of a van der waals gas is not constant across the gas.
 
Last edited:
great thanks, this is the kind of thing I was looking for. The earlier pdf is thick reading for me, but ill get there.
 
JamesWolf said:
The earlier pdf is thick reading for me, but ill get there.
You certainly should. WBN introduced those notes to me too and they are very informative.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top