Non Newtonian Fluids: Why & How Do They Respond to Stress?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hy23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluids Newtonian
AI Thread Summary
Non-Newtonian fluids, like the cornstarch and water mixture, exhibit unique stress responses due to their shear thickening properties. When subjected to low shear rates, these fluids flow easily as the liquid fills the gaps between closely packed particles. However, at higher shear rates, the liquid cannot adequately occupy these spaces, leading to increased friction and viscosity. This behavior is evident in mixtures like oobleck, which become rigid upon impact. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for applications involving non-Newtonian fluids in various industries.
hy23
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Why do non Newtonian fluids such as the cornstarch and water mixture respond to stress the way they do? What prompts the atoms to come together to resist the force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shear_thickening

A dilatant (also termed shear thickening) material is one in which viscosity increases with the rate of shear. Such a shear thickening fluid, also known by the acronym STF, is an example of a non-Newtonian fluid.

The dilatant effect occurs when closely packed particles are combined with enough liquid to fill the gaps between them. At low velocities, the liquid acts as a lubricant, and the dilatant flows easily. At higher velocities, the liquid is unable to fill the gaps created between particles, and friction greatly increases, causing an increase in viscosity.[1] This can readily be seen with a mixture of cornstarch and water[2] (sometimes called oobleck), which acts in counterintuitive ways when struck or thrown against a surface. Sand that is completely soaked with water also behaves as a dilatant material. This is the reason why when walking down the beach, a dry area always appears underneath your foot. ...

found above link in:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-Newtonian_fluid
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top