Non-Normal Subgroups in Simple Groups

  • Thread starter Thread starter spamiam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
spamiam
Messages
360
Reaction score
1
What are some simple groups that have non-normal subgroups? The only example I can think of is the alternating group for n > 4.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
all non abelian simple groups have non normal subgroups. i.e. they have even order, so they have elements of order 2, hence subgroups of order 2, which are necessarily non normal.
 
Thanks for your reply, mathwonk!

mathwonk said:
all non abelian simple groups have non normal subgroups. i.e. they have even order...

Wait, all non-abelian simple groups have even order? Or did you mean that as an example?

...so they have elements of order 2, hence subgroups of order 2, which are necessarily non normal.

Okay, the element of order 2 follows from Cauchy's theorem, but why are these subgroups "necessarily" non-normal? Is it just because we were already assuming the group was simple or is there a deeper reason?

I was kind of hoping for some specific examples of known groups. The only examples of simple groups with which I'm familiar are \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} and A_n for n > 4. Are there any other well-known ones?

Thanks again!
 
spamiam said:
Wait, all non-abelian simple groups have even order? Or did you mean that as an example?

Yes, a finite simple group is either \mathbb{Z}_p or have even order. This is the contents of the celebrated Feit-Thompson theorem.

Okay, the element of order 2 follows from Cauchy's theorem, but why are these subgroups "necessarily" non-normal? Is it just because we were already assuming the group was simple or is there a deeper reason?

That is correct. The subgroup is non-normal, because we assumed that the group was simple.

I was kind of hoping for some specific examples of known groups. The only examples of simple groups with which I'm familiar are \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} and A_n for n > 4. Are there any other well-known ones?

Thanks again!

To my knowledge, example of simple groups are kind of tricky. The article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_finite_simple_groups gives a list of simple groups. The most intriguing of these groups is the so-called monster group, which is very big. It contains a (non-normal of course) subgroup which is also huge and is called the baby monster.
 
micromass said:
This is the contents of the celebrated Feit-Thompson theorem.

Celebrated, eh? Looks like I might have to go celebrate with a textbook. :biggrin:

To my knowledge, example of simple groups are kind of tricky. The article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_finite_simple_groups gives a list of simple groups.

You weren't kidding! I could understand the construction of about 3 families out of that list. Thanks for the link!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top