Noncentral Elastic Collision: Return to Moving Particles

AI Thread Summary
In a noncentral elastic collision involving two particles, when transitioning from a scenario where one particle is at rest to one where both are moving, the velocity of the initially stationary particle should be added to both particles' velocities. This adjustment should be applied uniformly across the initial conditions and the resulting calculations. It is crucial to maintain the angles of the collision unchanged during this process. This method ensures that the conservation laws remain valid in the new reference frame. Properly applying these principles will clarify the dynamics of the system.
Gavroy
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
hi

i am describing a noncentral elastic collision between two particles. therefore i assumed that one of them is at rest. now i want to return back to the system where both particles are moving. do i only need to add the velocity of the particle at rest to both of them and leave all angles unchanged or is there something else i have to keep in mind? i am a little bit uncertain about this whole thing.

thank you for any kind of help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This link might help: www . phi . duke . edu/courses/217/MottScatteringReport/node8.html
 
sorry, link does not work.
 
Gavroy said:
hi

i am describing a noncentral elastic collision between two particles. therefore i assumed that one of them is at rest. now i want to return back to the system where both particles are moving. do i only need to add the velocity of the particle at rest to both of them and leave all angles unchanged or is there something else i have to keep in mind? i am a little bit uncertain about this whole thing.

thank you for any kind of help!

Just take your reference frame as one in which one of the particles is initially at rest. I.e. subtract that velocity everywhere from the initial conditions and add it back in everywhere to the answer.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top