Nondimensional substitutions for Insect Outbreak Model

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    quantities
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
The DE is Insect Outbreak Model: Spruce Budworn with Ludwig's predation model

\frac{dN}{dt}=r_BN\left(1-\frac{N}{K_B}\right)-\frac{BN^2}{A^2+N^2}

r_B is the linear birth rate

K_B is the carrying capacity

The last term is predation

A is the threshold where predation is switched on

A,K_B,N,r_B has the dimension (\text{time})^{-1}

B has the dimension N(\text{time})^{-1}

Nondimensional quantities

u=\frac{N}{A}, \ r=\frac{Ar_B}{B}, \ q=\frac{K_B}{A}, \ \tau=\frac{Bt}{A}

How were this substitutions decided on?

I see that u,q is nondimensional since they cancel, but r and tau I don't get it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you say that "B has dimension N(time)-1". Since you have said that N has dimensions of (time)-1 itself, do you mean that B has dimensions of (time)-2? If so then Bt has dimensions of (time)-1, the same as A and so Bt/A is dimensionless. Also, both A and rB have dimensions of (time)-1 so their product has dimension (time)-2, canceling the dimensions of B.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you say that "B has dimension N(time)-1". Since you have said that N has dimensions of (time)-1 itself, do you mean that B has dimensions of (time)-2? If so then Bt has dimensions of (time)-1, the same as A and so Bt/A is dimensionless. Also, both A and rB have dimensions of (time)-1 so their product has dimension (time)-2, canceling the dimensions of B.

That is probably right. I was just listing it how the book wrote it.

How were this substitutions figured out though?
 
Additionally, when I make the substitution, I should obtain:

\frac{du}{dt}=ru\left(1-\frac{u}{q}\right)-\frac{u^2}{1+u^2}

From the substitution, I actually obtain:

uBr\left(1-\frac{u}{q}\right)-\frac{A^3\tau N^2}{t(u+A^2N^2}

How can I manipulate that into the correct answer?

Or is there a mistake somewhere?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top