Nonhomogeneous system of linear equations

salistoun
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

How do u go about doing this question?

x - 2y +z =4
y- z =3
(a^2 - a - 2)z = a+1

Determine values of a for which the system has no solution, one solution and many solutions

Stephen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
salistoun said:
Hi all,

How do u go about doing this question?

x - 2y +z =4
y- z =3
(a^2 - a - 2)z = a+1

Determine values of a for which the system has no solution, one solution and many solutions

Stephen

Hey Stephen and welcome to the forums.

You should for this problem set up an augmented system and apply row-operations.

You could use MATLAB though and invert the matrix in terms an unknown number a and then check that you don't get an inconsistent system since a is in the RHS vector.

Show us what augmented system have and row operations to get your reduced system
 
What Chiro said is true, but it's probably quicker to start by factorizing ## (a^2 - a - 2)z = a+1## into ## (a+1)(a-2)z = a+1 ##, and thinking about when that equation has zero, one, or many solutions.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top