Can Nonlinear Simultaneous Equations Be Solved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter natski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nonlinear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the solvability of a three-dimensional non-linear simultaneous equation defined by A = x/y, B = y/z, and C = x/z. It is established that the equations lead to the relationship AB = C, which determines the conditions for solutions. If AB/C = 1, there are infinitely many solutions; otherwise, the only solution is (0, 0, 0). The equations can be visualized as planes in a three-dimensional space, where the intersection of these planes typically results in a single point. Thus, the conclusion is that the equations can either yield infinite solutions or only the trivial solution based on the values of A, B, and C.
natski
Messages
262
Reaction score
2
Hi all,

I have more or less convinced myself through trial and error that the following three-dimensional non-linear simultaneous equation cannot be solved. However, it would be great if someone could provide me with a proper mathematical reason as to why this is not solvable, rather than me simply stating I can't do it...

Solve...
A = x/y
B = y/z
C = x/z
for {x,y,z} in terms of {A,B,C} only

Any help is greatly appreciated,

natski
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
One problem is you have A = x/y, or x = Ay, and C = x/z, or x = Cz. This means Ay = Cz, or y/z = C/A = B (or AB = C, which is all you can really discover, other than the only solution is (0,0,0)).
 
Multiplying your first two equations and dividing by the third gives AB/C = 1. If that is not true, there is no solution. If AB/C = 1, there are an infinite number of solutions. Choose any value for z you like, then x = Cz, y = Bz is a solution.
 
You can also look at it from a spatial persepctive. The first equation gives a plane passing through the z axis defined by y=Ax. The second gives another plane passing through the x-axis defined by y = Bz. The third gives a plane passing through the y-axis defined by x = Cz. The intersection of three planes, none of which are parallel, coplanar, etc., is a point. The only solution is the point (0, 0, 0), regardless of what A, B and C are.

Edited: By only solution, I mean the only solution regardless of what A, B and C are. You can have other solutions that depend on what A, B and C are.
 
Last edited:
Great, thanks for the help is visualizing that!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top