Nonsinusodial wave function problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a wave function problem in quantum mechanics, specifically showing that the function ψ(x) = Ax + B satisfies the Schrödinger equation for a particle in a box at E = 0. The boundary conditions at x = 0 and x = L lead to the conclusion that both constants A and B must equal zero, resulting in a trivial wave function of ψ(x) = 0. This outcome indicates that there is no probability of finding a particle in the box, raising questions about the purpose of the problem. Participants express confusion over the application of boundary conditions and the implications of arriving at a zero eigenfunction, which is typically not considered a valid solution. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding boundary conditions in quantum mechanics and the nature of wave functions.
EngageEngage
Messages
203
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am having a problem with an example problem in my physics book. The example goes like so:

a.)Show that
\psi(x) = Ax + B
A, B, constant
is a solution of the Schrodinger equation for an E = 0 energy level of a particle in a box. b.) what constraints do the boundary conditions at x = 0 and x = L place on the constants A and B?


Homework Equations


\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}\psi(x)}{dx^{2}}= E\psi(x)


The Attempt at a Solution


Part a i understand completely -- i just take the second derivative of the wave function and find its eigenvalue to be 0, which corresponds to the energy. However, for part b, I am not quite understanding how the book applies the boundary conditions. They claim the following:

"applying the boundary condition:
x = 0
\psi(0) = A = 0
so,
A = 0, and \psi(x) = Bx.
Then applying the boundary condition:
x = L
gives \psi(L) = BL = 0
so B must be zero. How are they finding this for the IVP? If i plug zero into the wave function i get B = 0, not A = 0. I must be missing something. Could someone please tell me what I'm not seeing? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Agreed. If psi is zero at x = 0, then there no constant term (the linear wavefunction starts at the origin). ==> B = 0.

The other boundary condition would give you AL = 0. ==> A = 0.

So, the wavefunction is identically zero. Which means that there is no chance of a particle being in the box. So what was the point of this problem exactly?

Edit: By this, what I mean is that, isn't this the TRIVIAL solution to the eigenvalue equation? If there is no particle in the box, the energy of the system is zero (inside the box).

Edit 2: In fact, I thought that a zero eigenfunction was not allowed as a valid solution to the eigenvalue equation, because it would have infinitely many possible eigenvalues.
 
Last edited:
The problem was intented to be trivial i think to show that you can't have a valid wave function of this form since you would get zero probability of finding your particle anywhere. But, I am glad that you also get AL = 0 and B = 0 instead of A = 0 and BL = 0 (they lead to the same thing but them getting it in that form is somewhat bothersome for me because I feel like I'm missing somehing). Thank you for the help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top