Normal Conditional Distribution

learner928
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Anyone know answer to below.

If two random variables X and Y are both marginally normal, and conditional distribution of Y given any value of X is also normal.

Does this automatically mean the conditional distribution of X given any value of Y also has to be normal? or not necessarily.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey learner928 and welcome to the forums.

GIven P(Y|X) is Normal, P(X) is Normal, P(Y) is normal so P(X|Y) is proportional to P(Y|X)*P(X) (using a posterior) and if P(Y|X) has normal PDF with P(X) having a normal PDF, then the posterior will also have a normal PDF.

You can prove this by starting off with two PDF expressions P(A) = Normal_PDF_1, P(B) = Normal_PDF_2 and then multiply the two together and show that the product is also a Normal PDF and you're done.
 
chiro said:
Hey learner928 and welcome to the forums.

GIven P(Y|X) is Normal, P(X) is Normal, P(Y) is normal so P(X|Y) is proportional to P(Y|X)*P(X) (using a posterior) and if P(Y|X) has normal PDF with P(X) having a normal PDF, then the posterior will also have a normal PDF.

You can prove this by starting off with two PDF expressions P(A) = Normal_PDF_1, P(B) = Normal_PDF_2 and then multiply the two together and show that the product is also a Normal PDF and you're done.


Thanks Chiro, just to confirm, so your argument still applies even if P(X) and P(Y) are not independent right,

so in conclusion,
Even if P(X) and P(Y) are not independent, if P(X), P(Y) and P(Y|X) are all normal, then P(X|Y) also has to be normal.
 
If they are not independent normal then you will have a covariance matrix with off-diagonal positions, or you will have in general, a relationship where A = f(B) [A and f(A) both normal] so what you should do in this case is use limits that reflect the dependencies (which is what happens in dependent distributions).

You should however be able to prove that the product is normal (even if they are dependent or related) by assuming both have normal PDF and thus the product has a normal PDF.

The big difference will be the region of integration, and how these limits allow you to calculate an actual probability for your final variable.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top