Normal Distribution: Mean & Std Dev for Conditional Expected Values

Einstein
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
A normal distribution can be completely defined by two parameters - the mean and the standard deviation. Given a normal distribution however, say X, how can I use just the mean and the standard deviation to give me conditional expected values for X<=0 and for X>0? I am guessing the distribution can be standardised to obtain a z-statistic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Given a normal distribution however, say X" - I assume you mean that the variable X has a normal distribution. Are both \mu and \sigma known?

"how can I use just the mean and the standard deviation to give me conditional expected values for X \le 0 and for X&gt;0 ?"
This doesn't make sense to me as it stands. In statistics we take expected values of some function of a random variable - can you elaborate on what it is you seek?
 
If X has normal distribution with mean \mu and standard deviation \sigma then z= (x- \mu)/\sigma has the standard normal distribution. As statdad said, "conditional expected values for X< 0 and X> 0" makes no sense." I might interpret as "suppose X a standard normal distribution, restricted to be larger than 0. What is the the expected value of X?"

That would be
\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_0^\infty x e^{-x^2}dx= \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi}}
The general problem, with non-zero mean or standard deviation not 1 would be a much harder integral.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top