Normal force in circular motion

AI Thread Summary
In circular motion, the normal force experienced by a person on a ferris wheel varies depending on their position. At the top of the ferris wheel, the normal force is less than at the bottom due to the gravitational force acting downward, which aids in providing the necessary centripetal force. Conversely, at the bottom, the normal force must counteract gravity and provide the centripetal force, resulting in a greater normal force. The key forces acting on the person include gravity and the normal force, which together determine the net force required for circular motion. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing forces in circular motion scenarios.
AbsoluteZer0
Messages
124
Reaction score
1
Hi,

Suppose we have a fellow on a ferris wheel. Would the normal force be greater on the top or at the bottom of the ferris wheel? I'm thinking that it would be greater at the top, or am I wrong?

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's your reasoning? What forces act on the person?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top