Normal Force on an Inclined Plane: Does it Depend on the Coordinate System?

AI Thread Summary
The normal force on an inclined plane does not depend on the coordinate system used; it is always perpendicular to the surface. For a mass on an inclined plane, the correct expression for the normal force is N = mg cos(θ), regardless of the coordinate system orientation. The confusion arises when incorrectly applying the equations for forces in different coordinate systems, leading to erroneous results. It is essential to ensure that the forces in the perpendicular direction add to zero, which confirms the correct calculation of the normal force. Understanding this principle helps clarify common mistakes made by students in physics.
cherian
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am a new user so if I am violating any rules I apologize


If we have a mass on an inclined plane ,

Does the Normal force depend on Coordinate used. i.e coordinate system along rod( tilted one) and coordinate system in the regular way

I know the answer is " NO" but I get


N= MgCos(theta) for tilted one
and N= Mg/cos(theta) for straight one

Same is happening for a rod rotating about the edge of a table


Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi cherian, welcome to PF.

I am not really sure what you are asking here, but no it doesn't matter. If the inclined plane is stationary the you are correct in saying that N = mg\cos\theta where \theta is the angle of inclination . In the second case remember \cos0 = 1 because the plane is inclined at 0 degrees.
Sorry if I have misunderstood your question.
 
Sorry I can't express it very well. The plane is inclined in both cases. The cases that I mention is the choice of coordinate system. We can select a coordinate system in which X is parallel to the the mass and Y is perpendicular to the mass ( the tilted one) or
We can choose X and Y in regular way ( how we draw in regular way in paper)
 
cherian said:
N= MgCos(theta) for tilted one
and N= Mg/cos(theta) for straight one
I assume you are trying to figure out the normal force (which is always perpendicular to the surface) using different coordinate systems.

Taking coordinates parallel and perpendicular is easiest. Forces in the y-direction (perpendicular to the surface) must add to zero: N - Mg cos(theta) = 0. (Your first result.)

Your second equation comes from setting the vertical forces equal to zero: N cos(theta) -Mg = 0. The problem is: The vertical forces do not add to zero! So that equation is bogus.
 
I apologize, there was lack of thinking before I posted it, My bad
 
No need to apologize for asking a question! :smile: The only thing that matters is whether you received a useful answer.

(You'd be surprised at how many students make that same error! Switching coordinate systems can get confusing.)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top