Normal Force/Scale: Clarifying Confused Concept

  • Thread starter Thread starter davev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal
AI Thread Summary
When a scale reads a value, it measures the normal force exerted on an object placed on it. In an accelerating elevator, this value changes; when the elevator accelerates upward, the scale shows a higher reading due to the additional force needed to counteract the object's weight. Conversely, when the elevator accelerates downward, the scale displays a lower reading as the object experiences a brief moment of free fall. This phenomenon occurs because the scale must exert less force to maintain equilibrium during downward acceleration. Understanding these dynamics clarifies how scales function in non-inertial frames.
davev
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I just wanted to clarify a concept that I'm confused about. When a problem states that a scale reads a value, is that value the normal force? If it is, is that value the normal force, let's say, on an accelerating elevator too? Or is it actually the weight on the accelerating elevator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scales measure weight by measuring the force they need to exert on the object on them,to make the net vertical force on it to become zero.And so They measure the normal force.
Now if we put a scale in an elevator and put something on it,when the elevator is going up,its bottom surface exerts a force on the scale to carry it and the scale exerts a force on the object on it to carry it with itself and that force is in addition to the force to counter the weight of the object and so the normal force is increased and the scale shows a number bigger than the object's weight in an un-accelerated frame.
But when the elevator is going down.Its a bit more strange but I think I can say that in this situation,the elevator's room is directly subject to the force of the elevator's engine and so it accelerates down but the scale and the object just tend to be at rest.So when the elevator accelerates down,the scale and the object stop at rest momentarily till they feel that the normal force provided by the bottom surface of the elevator is removed and so they free fall for a very brief moment.That brief moment of free fall is experienced by the scale and the object as a decrease in weight.And so the scale shows a smaller value for the weight of the object compared to its weight in an un-accelerated frame.
 
Thank you! Makes sense!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top