Normalization of a delta function in curved spacetime

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Which of the following are true in curved spacetime?

\int d^4 x \delta^4(x - x_0) = 1 (1)

\int d^4 x \sqrt{-g} \delta^4(x - x_0) = 1 (2)

I think the first one is incorrect in curved spacetime, or in general when the metric is non-constant. I would argue this by saying that the delta function does not transform, whereas the fourth-order differential transforms in the opposite way to \sqrt{-g}, so the whole thing transforms as a scalar as it must.

I've also heard that \delta^4 is not a scalar, which suggests that (1) is the correct statement. However, this seems strange to me as I would think that (1) will fail to hold in curvilinear coordinates e.g.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
actually the right difinition is
\int_M F(x^{\mu})[\frac{\delta^{(4)}(x^{\sigma}-y^{\sigma})}{\sqrt{-g}}]\sqrt{-g}d^4x=F(y^{\sigma})
 
The delta function is a scalar density. You don't need curved space or four dimensions to see this, it follows from the identity δ(f(x)) = (1/|f '(x0)|) δ(x-x0) where f(x0) = 0. For example δ(3x) = (1/3) δ(x). Or take plane polar coordinates: δ(x) ≡ δ(x) δ(y) = (1/r) δ(r) δ(Θ).
 
Last edited:
jdstokes said:
Which of the following are true in curved spacetime?

\int d^4 x \delta^4(x - x_0) = 1 (1)

\int d^4 x \sqrt{-g} \delta^4(x - x_0) = 1 (2)

I think the first one is incorrect in curved spacetime, or in general when the metric is non-constant. I would argue this by saying that the delta function does not transform, whereas the fourth-order differential transforms in the opposite way to \sqrt{-g}, so the whole thing transforms as a scalar as it must.

I've also heard that \delta^4 is not a scalar, which suggests that (1) is the correct statement. However, this seems strange to me as I would think that (1) will fail to hold in curvilinear coordinates e.g.

I'd say that

\int d^4 x \delta^4(x - x_0) = 1

is the usual definition. The RHS is trivially a scalar. The measure on the LHS is a density. So the delta distribution is also a density, as was mentioned by others here.

You can "tensorize" the delta distribution by defining

<br /> \delta^4(x - x_0) \rightarrow \frac{\delta^4(x - x_0) }{\sqrt{g}}<br />
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Back
Top