Normalizing Data: Unknown Values

  • Thread starter Thread starter g.lemaitre
  • Start date Start date
g.lemaitre
Messages
267
Reaction score
2
Screenshot2012-08-15at102228PM.png


I don't see how they know this is properly normalized. None of the values are specified, not psi, a sub i, E sub i, a sub k, or p sub i.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They're not saying that this equation follows from anything that has been given so far. They're introducing a label, "properly normalized", which can be applied to a state if and only if the condition in 1.31 is true.

Equation 1.29 tells you that any quantum state can be thought of as a weighted combination of energy states, whose weights are given by a_i. What they're saying is that if someone hands you some arbitrary state, you can find those values by using 1.30. If the values that you find happen to satisfy 1.31, then you can call the state a normalized state. If not, then you can't call it that. In the case of a non-normalized state, you can make it normalized by dividing every a_i by the total magnitude, which is what they're doing in 1.32. You can check to confirm that doing this will ensure that \langle \psi | \psi \rangle = 1.
 
thanks for clearing that up for me
 
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top