North Korea - another nuclear weapon test

  • News
  • Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date
  • #1
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,082
5,212
North Korea apparently detonated a nuclear weapon - again.

M5.3 Explosion - 19km ENE of Sungjibaegam, North Korea
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us10006n8a#executive
2016-09-09 00:30:01 UTC 41.298°N 129.015°E 0.0 km depth

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) -- North Korea on Friday conducted its fifth atomic test, producing its biggest-ever explosive yield, South Korean officials said after monitors detected unusual seismic activity near the North's northeastern nuclear test site.

South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said in a statement that "artificial seismic waves" from a quake measuring 5.0 were detected near the Punggye-ri test site.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/monitors-report-unusual-seismic-activity-north-korea-005818504.html [Broken]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/key-dates-north-korean-history-weapons-development-052748683.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,163
1,346
Thus: the US is at war with a nuclear power.
 
  • #3
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
29,918
15,598
Thus: the US is at war with a nuclear power.

That's correct. And if DPRK keeps with launching rockets at Japan that may or may not contain a nuclear warhead, sooner or later it may well become the beneficiary of some rapid US disarmament, and turned into 46,000 square miles of glass inhabited by a few dozen glowing cockroaches. And China will then have its long desired buffer zone.
 
  • Like
Likes edward and mheslep
  • #4
mheslep
Gold Member
360
728
It doesn't seem feasible to me that the DPRK could manage a missile with a nuclear warhead in the next couple decades. The uranium weapon Little Boy had mass five tons, while the DPRK missile designs apparently have a payload of less than one ton. I suspect getting into the nuclear missile business requires lower mass thermonuclear weapons, or much higher missile payloads, or both. DPRK is not close to either. If that maniac is determined to attack Japan or S Korea, then floating a barge into a harbor seems more likely.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
mheslep
Gold Member
360
728
Thus: the US is at war with a nuclear power.
*Cold* war perhaps. Otherwise the definition of war has lost touch with what it meant in WWII, the Korean War, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan.
 
  • #6
.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,163
1,346
*Cold* war perhaps. Otherwise the definition of war has lost touch with what it meant in WWII, the Korean War, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan.
There was a big difference between (WWI and WWII) versus (Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan). Those first two wars were "all out" and involved life changes to almost all Americans.

By comparison, the later three were (along with many others) were limited expeditions. We sent troops over while keeping a wary eye on other global powers.

So, including "cold", I would say there are at least three types of "war".

And then there were the half wars - where a neighbor attacks Israel, Israel defends too well, and the superpowers decide the war needs to end before it is resolved on the battle field. Q: What's worse than finding a worm in your apple? A: Fighting half a war!
 
  • #7
mheslep
Gold Member
360
728
I start with American troops being sent into harms way. The other differences are a matter of degree. These are significant but secondary.
 
  • #8
russ_watters
Mentor
22,120
9,263
I start with American troops being sent into harms way. The other differences are a matter of degree. These are significant but secondary.
I believe @.Scott is referring to the paperwork issue whereby we are still technically engaged in The Korean War.
 
  • #9
mheslep
Gold Member
360
728
I believe @.Scott is referring to the paperwork issue whereby we are still technically engaged in The Korean War.
Thanks, I'd forgotten.
 
  • #10
.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,163
1,346
I believe @.Scott is referring to the paperwork issue whereby we are still technically engaged in The Korean War.
To add to the "paperwork", they are currently holding a fully commissioned US Navy Ship.
 
  • #11
russ_watters
Mentor
22,120
9,263
To add to the "paperwork", they are currently holding a fully commissioned US Navy Ship.
That's part of the same paperwork issue. I doubt anyone is expecting we are going to get it back. We also have a handful of captured ships (subs) of about the same age that the Germans aren't asking to have back. When the peace treaty gets signed, they'll just strike it from the register as a casualty of the war.
 

Suggested for: North Korea - another nuclear weapon test

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
331
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
334
Replies
3
Views
379
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
514
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
527
Replies
7
Views
621
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
1K
Top