North Magnetic Pole wandering away

In Summary, according to the experts, there is a movement of the north magnetic pole that is causing an update to a navigation model. This mainly affects navigation in the Arctic Ocean north of Canada. There is no indication that the pole flip is happening, but some professionals are hinting that it may be a precursor to a magnetic reversal.
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #3
  • #4
pinball1970 said:
Is this part of the "flipping?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal

No, the 2 listed links didn't appear to mention magnetic pole flipping.

The text from Tom's link ...
North magnetic pole's movement forces unprecedented navigation fix
ReutersArticle history
  • Online: Jan 12, 2019
  • Last Modified: Jan 12, 2019


OSLO - Rapid shifts in the Earth’s north magnetic pole are forcing researchers to make an unprecedented early update to a model that helps navigation by ships, planes and submarines in the Arctic.

Compass needles point toward the north magnetic pole, a point that has crept unpredictably from the coast of northern Canada a century ago to the middle of the Arctic Ocean, moving toward Russia.

“It’s moving at about 50 km (30 miles) a year. It didn’t move much between 1900 and 1980 but it’s really accelerated in the past 40 years,” said Ciaran Beggan, of the British Geological Survey in Edinburgh, on Friday.

A five-year update of the World Magnetic Model was due in 2020 but the U.S. military requested an unprecedented early review, he said. The BGS runs the model with the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Beggan said the moving pole affects navigation, mainly in the Arctic Ocean north of Canada. NATO and the U.S. and British militaries are among those using the magnetic model, as well as civilian navigation.

The wandering pole is driven by unpredictable changes in flows of liquid iron deep inside the Earth. An update will be released on Jan. 30, the journal Nature said, delayed from Jan. 15 because of the U.S. government shutdown.

“The fact that the pole is going fast makes this region more prone to large errors,” Arnaud Chulliat, a geomagnetist at the University of Colorado Boulder and NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information, told Nature.

Beggan said the recent shifts in the north magnetic pole would be unnoticed by most people outside the Arctic. Navigation systems in cars or phones rely on radio waves from satellites high above the Earth to pinpoint their position on the ground.

“It doesn’t really affect mid- or low latitudes,” Beggan said. “It wouldn’t really affect anyone driving a car.”

Many smartphones have compasses to help to orientate maps or games. In most places, however, the compass would be pointing only fractionally wrong, within errors allowed in the five-year models, Beggan said.

The pdf file in Baluncore's link is a very indepth and highly mathematical study/research into the predicted pole positions over
5 years from 2015 to 2020

There are a number of links on the net that lead to papers from professionals that are hinting that the increased and faster
wanderings of the magnetic poles is a prelude to a magnetic reversal (flip)

I will let you go do some reading :smile:Dave

edit: fix typo
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and berkeman
  • #5
Does not answer anything, but entertaining and timely, from XKCD:
Screen Shot 2019-01-15 at 11.30.21 AM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-01-15 at 11.30.21 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-01-15 at 11.30.21 AM.png
    23.3 KB · Views: 3,731
  • #6
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
davenn said:
No, the 2 listed links didn't appear to mention magnetic pole flipping.

The text from Tom's link ...The pdf file in Baluncore's link is a very indepth and highly mathematical study/research into the predicted pole positions over
5 years from 2015 to 202

There are a number of links on the net that lead to papers from professionals that are hinting that the increased and faster
wanderings of the magnetic poles is a prelude to a magnetic reversal (flip)

I will let you go do some reading :smile:

Dave
Thanks to you and Tom G
 
  • #8
BillTre said:
Does not answer anything, but entertaining and timely, from XKCD:
View attachment 237345

Will this affect any sort of migration? Birds? Insects? I am sketchy on the details but I would have though both a drift and the flip would do something
 
  • #9

Attachments

  • 2019_01_Earths-Magnetic-Field.jpg
    2019_01_Earths-Magnetic-Field.jpg
    32.8 KB · Views: 2,541
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #10
jim mcnamara said:
The magnetic movement is nothing new.
yeah but its wanderings over the last 1500 odd years is far more impressive ...

figure-9-the-closer-to-the-magnetic-pole-the-colder-it-gets2.png


[ https://planet-earth-2017.com/wandering-poles/ ]
jim mcnamara said:
So if movement of the pole would damage species/ecosystems it should have been obvious by now.

ummm going by pinball1970's question ...

pinball1970 said:
Will this affect any sort of migration? Birds? Insects? I am sketchy on the details but I would have though both a drift and the flip would do something

he was more interested in migration problems with changing position/pole flip rather than "damage" to the ecosystemI couldn't help but believe that a total pole flip would totally screw up those species that use the magnetic field for migration navigationDave
 

Attachments

  • figure-9-the-closer-to-the-magnetic-pole-the-colder-it-gets2.png
    figure-9-the-closer-to-the-magnetic-pole-the-colder-it-gets2.png
    102.3 KB · Views: 2,359
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000 and Nik_2213
  • #11
All I'm saying is that the effect of geomagnetic reversal on migratory bird species cannot be massive. We would see population crash patterns in the fossil record that matched the black and white graph below. The reason we do not see bird population crashes: bird navigation is multifaceted. Any species that relied totally on magnetic navigation would have been very strongly selected against, multifaceted navigators strongly selected for.

Points:

1. I am not aware of any paleontological data supporting catastrophic decline in bird populations or drastic speciation during the last pole flip.
If you have support for these declines, please let us know.

2. Pole wandering is apparently the norm, based on geological data. @davenn posted a link about a timeline of past "flip" events.
Here is another one, showing the past 5 million years and more than 20 reversals :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal
From the article ---

428px-Geomagnetic_polarity_late_Cenozoic.svg.png


Black versus white: times during which geomagnetic polarity in black matches today's polarity, white is a reversal of that. Note some very thin black lines, short period events.

3. Bird navigation is based on one or multiples of the following:
per https://www.allaboutbirds.org/the-basics-migration-navigation/
Code:
visual -
    star maps for night migrating species
    imprinting
    landmarks and maps of them
    sun based
olfactory
   olfactory maps
magnetic
   magnetic field sensing

Please read the attached article.
 

Attachments

  • 428px-Geomagnetic_polarity_late_Cenozoic.svg.png
    428px-Geomagnetic_polarity_late_Cenozoic.svg.png
    5.8 KB · Views: 2,228
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000, pinball1970, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #12
If the Earth's magnetic field decreased while flipping rather than going through a period where it was perhaps pointing at the equator, might more solar radiation reach the surface?
If so, this could cause an increase in mutation to exposed lifeforms.
Depending on how much of an increase, it could be lethal or just increase genetic variability of many species.
 
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000
  • #13
AFAIK, decreased magnetosphere increases the loss of molecules and atoms from the atmosphere - essentially what happened to Mars.
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasas-maven-reveals-most-of-mars-atmosphere-was-lost-to-space
So if Earth lost most of the magnetosphere, in 200 million years we'd look like Mars.

For living things ionizing radiation on the land surface becomes lethal, so biota surviving are mostly underground or in deep enough water to reduce exposure to UV & Gamma. Higher plants did not colonize land until the Ordovician. The assumption is the level of protection from UV light that the ozone layer provides did not become sufficient until then.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_history_of_plants
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes davenn and BillTre
  • #14
jim mcnamara said:
All I'm saying is that the effect of geomagnetic reversal on migratory bird species cannot be massive. We would see population crash patterns in the fossil record that matched the black and white graph below. The reason we do not see bird population crashes: bird navigation is multifaceted. Any species that relied totally on magnetic navigation would have been very strongly selected against, multifaceted navigators strongly selected for.

Points:

1. I am not aware of any paleontological data supporting catastrophic decline in bird populations or drastic speciation during the last pole flip.
If you have support for these declines, please let us know.

2. Pole wandering is apparently the norm, based on geological data. @davenn posted a link about a timeline of past "flip" events.
Here is another one, showing the past 5 million years and more than 20 reversals :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal
From the article ---Please read the attached article.

Thanks Jim/Bill
 
  • #15
BillTre said:
If the Earth's magnetic field decreased while flipping rather than going through a period where it was perhaps pointing at the equator, might more solar radiation reach the surface?
If so, this could cause an increase in mutation to exposed lifeforms.
Depending on how much of an increase, it could be lethal or just increase genetic variability of many species.
It is not an unheard-of theory, nor even considered “fringe”, but it has always been my impression that it is far from being widely accepted. It is consistent with the model usually called “Punctuated Equilibrium “, which holds that evolution is not always a slow and steady process, but is marked with sudden fits and starts.

There is a book called Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leeps by Jay Yoder, PhD from Illinois College Dept of Biology. The mainstream does not completely poo-poo the idea, but maybe just “poo” it.

There is some pretty great work being done at the University of Maryland by Dr Dan Lathrop…
http://complex.umd.edu/
 
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000
  • #16
Tesla's motor work would fix the pole flip. I know he would have the answer.
 
  • #17
bhusebye said:
Tesla's motor work would fix the pole flip. I know he would have the answer.
Tesla would have been unable to fix the wandering monopole because he was bipolar.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes phinds, JBA, 256bits and 1 other person
  • #18
Beggan said the recent shifts in the north magnetic pole would be unnoticed by most people outside the Arctic. Navigation systems in cars or phones rely on radio waves from satellites high above the Earth to pinpoint their position on the ground.

It can very clearly be seen by sunrises and sunsets operating at different timelines of day/night. Wobbling Earth is fascinating. Most satellites are able to be configured, but the observable changes are highly important.
 
  • #19
Growing up at 65* N and 150* W my compass has always been 30* off. This is as a teenager in the 1960's.
Currently it is 20* off due to the magnetic pole's movement being close to the same radius as the geographic pole from this reference point. It is really cruising.
 
  • #20
It is cruising. This is the first time that the WMM has required an out-of-cycle update (not supposed to exceed 1 deg. RMS over each five-year lifespan, and WMM2015 met 1.5 deg. RMS in March of 2018; updated in January of 2019). What I find especially odd, is the fact that the westward drift began accelerating near the year 2000--the same time that the rotation axis turned to the east (south), and UT1-UTC began slowing. https://datacenter.iers.org/singlePlot.php?plotname=FinalsAllIAU2000A-UT1-UTC-BULA&id=9
 
  • #21
The number painted on the end of airport runways is the magnetic bearing in degrees, with the least significant digit removed. So to land on runway 27 you should be flying 270° magnetic, which is west on approach by magnetic compass.

Have any arctic airport runways needed to be renumbered yet ?
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189, Bystander and BillTre
  • #22
Baluncore said:
The number painted on the end of airport runways is the magnetic bearing in degrees, with the least significant digit removed. So to land on runway 27 you should be flying 270° magnetic, which is west on approach by magnetic compass.

Have any arctic airport runways needed to be renumbered yet ?
They repaint them regurarly. Often 15-20 lanes at the same time in Norway
 
  • Skeptical
Likes davenn
  • #23
Baluncore said:
Have any arctic airport runways needed to be renumbered yet ?
Yes. Generally speaking, the closer a runway is to the migrating N. magnetic pole, the greater the local magnetic variation will be at that runway location upon increased magnetic migration. Similarly, the further a runway location from the migrating N. magnetic pole, the less local magnetic variation those runways will experience. Consequently, runway renames are occurring pretty much everywhere--but especially in the Arctic.
 

Attachments

  • Recently_renamed_runways.pdf
    86.1 KB · Views: 325
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000 and Baluncore
  • #24
Is there any information in any of the above references about the location of the magnetic poles at the time of the initiation of the prior flips; or, is the distance of the normal movement of the pole(s) not sufficient to be able to identify that from the radiometric analysis of rocks.
 
  • #25
JBA said:
Is there any information in any of the above references about the location of the magnetic poles at the time of the initiation of the prior flips; or, is the distance of the normal movement of the pole(s) not sufficient to be able to identify that from the radiometric analysis of rocks.
Magnetic reversals occur on average about every 125,000 years. It is now over 800,000 years since the last reversal which is unusual. Radiometric dates do not have sufficient accuracy to record accurate time detail.

Here is the old 27 at O'Hare wearing out while it is replaced with the new 28.

O'Hare Renumber.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000, diogenesNY and Bystander
  • #26
Magnetic compass is my primary nav tool on my sailboat so I need to account for declination. Here in the Gulf of Mexico it isn't too much but in the Bahamas its over 10 degrees
 
  • #27
Curious about what the answers will be...

Do you think that using global, ground and airborne GCR measurements as a proxy for real-time geomagnetic field strength is a bad idea? why/why not?
 
  • #28
alva3 said:
Do you think that using global, ground and airborne GCR measurements as a proxy for real-time geomagnetic field strength is a bad idea? why/why not?
Why would you measure global, ground and airbourne Galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), when it is easier to measure the magnetic field at existing fixed surface stations?
Have you found a sufficiently reliable relationship between the two for them to be proxies?
 
  • #29
Very good questions. My understanding and basic thinking were based upon curiosity more than anything else. GCRs have a clear anti-correlation with sunspot numbers (SSNs) <citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.660.3216&rep=rep1&type=pdf> due to them collecting along the magnetopause and not being swept away from solar wind during periods of solar quiet, I wondered if there might be a way to use GCRs as a means to measure the overall strength in "real-time" (e.g. the geomagnetic field strength as a percentage of what would be considered 100% field strength--similar to what it was assumed to be ~ 3000 years ago).

https://www.pnas.org/content/109/16/5967
O’Callaghan, J. (2018) “Earth’s magnetic poles could start to flip. What happens
then?”. Retrieved from Horizon: The EU Research & Innovation Magazine:
https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/188497/reporting/en, December 7, 2018.
 
  • #31
I think that it technically crossed the Antimeridian (180 meridian), but yes, on the move. The new WMM suggests that it has slowed, but that remains to be seen. The next two years will be critical in determining definitively.
 
  • #32
When close to the geographic pole it is easy for a magnetic pole to cross the prime or the anti-meridian, they are so close together. I'm looking forward to seeing it cross the equator.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre

What is the North Magnetic Pole?

The North Magnetic Pole is the point on the Earth's surface where the planet's magnetic field points vertically downwards.

Why does the North Magnetic Pole wander?

The North Magnetic Pole is constantly moving due to changes in the Earth's liquid outer core. This causes fluctuations in the planet's magnetic field, resulting in the pole's movement.

How much does the North Magnetic Pole move each year?

The North Magnetic Pole can move up to 55 kilometers per year. However, the rate and direction of movement can vary from year to year.

What are the potential consequences of the North Magnetic Pole's movement?

The movement of the North Magnetic Pole can affect navigation systems, as well as the accuracy of compasses and other magnetic instruments. It can also impact animal migration patterns and the behavior of certain species that rely on the Earth's magnetic field for navigation.

Is the North Magnetic Pole expected to continue wandering in the future?

Yes, the North Magnetic Pole is expected to continue its wandering trend in the future. Scientists predict that it will continue to move towards Siberia at a rate of approximately 40 kilometers per year.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Writing: Input Wanted Great Lakes Earth Map
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
2K
Writing: Read Only Great Lakes Earth
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
27K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
11K
Back
Top