Not all functions have Asymptotes, right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sabellic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of asymptotes in various functions, particularly non-reciprocal ones like f(x)=x and f(x)=x^2, which do not have asymptotes. It is noted that while ln(x) has a vertical asymptote at x=0, other functions like tan(x), sec(x), and cosec(x) are defined as fractions and may complicate the definition. The conversation highlights that f(x)=x can be considered to have an asymptote y=x under a broader definition, while f(x)=x^2 does not. The functions exp(x) and 2^x are acknowledged to have horizontal asymptotes. Ultimately, the definition of asymptote varies, affecting how functions like the square root of x and absolute value of x are classified.
Sabellic
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering about asymptotes. I know that the symptotes for 1/f(x) for example is established by isolating f(x) and setting f(x)=0.

However, I was wondering if non-reciprocal functions such as f(x)=x or f(x)=x^2 have asymptotes. I was thinking "no" because there is no axis that they approach but do not intersect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ln x which is a non-reciprocal function has a vertical aymptote at x=0. And so do tan x, sec x, cosec x.

EDIT: Okay, so maybe tan x, sec x and cosec x doesn't count because they are defined as a fraction of functions.

The two functions you describe do not have asymptotes.
 
f(x) can be said to have an asymptote, y=x, if you are generous in the wording of the definition of asymptote and allow asymptotes that aren't vertical or horizontal. f(x)=x^2 definitely doesn't have any. exp(x) has a horizontal asymptote. Isn't that a 'non-reciprocal' function? You just need to be clear about the exact definition of asymptote and apply it to each function.
 
Oh, that's right. f(x)=2^x does have a horizontal asymptote. And yes, I was thinking more of having either horizontal or vertical asymptotes.

Thank you very much.

How about the case of f(x)=square root of x, or f(x)=absolute value of x?

Because these the former touches the y-axis but can't have a x value less than zero; whilst the latter touches the x-axis but can't have a y value less than zero. Can these be defined as asymptotes or would I just define their limits in the set notation?
 
f(x)=sqrt(x), no. For f(x)=|x|, again, you have to look at the exact wording of your definition of 'asymptote'. It's more of a technical legal question. Not everyone uses exactly the same one all the time.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top