Not really understanding p orbitals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan Monaghan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbitals
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding p orbitals in chemistry, particularly their shape and significance. The s orbital is described as spherical, representing the general area where an electron may be found. As one moves across the periodic table, the p orbital takes on a "baseball bat-like" appearance, indicating the region where valence electrons are likely located. It is clarified that the p orbital represents a space where there is a 90% probability of finding an electron, and the wave function explains the electron's movement through these regions. Overall, the explanations confirm the accuracy of the initial understanding of orbitals and their representations.
Dan Monaghan
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I'm taking o-chem this trimester and we're reviewing some stuff from the end of gen chem last tri that I probably should have had down, but it's not making sense.

It's the representations of orbitals around atoms and molecules. I get the s orbital. At least I think so. It forms a spherical shape around the nucleus of the atom. Now, that represents the general area of where the electron could be. Now as we move down the rows of the periodic table towards the right and have more and more valence electrons in the outer shell this changes to a p orbital. Also, let's forget about f and d orbitals for right now. The p orbitals have this weird baseball bat-like appearance. Now this is the representation for the general space of where those electrons in that valence shell could be. Am I right?

Now when the electron moves through these "general spaces," they move in a wave format, hence the term wave function.

Have I missed anything or is what I said correct?

I have more questions about this, but I think I should start off slow.

thanks in advance for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dan Monaghan said:
Hi.

I'm taking o-chem this trimester and we're reviewing some stuff from the end of gen chem last tri that I probably should have had down, but it's not making sense.

It's the representations of orbitals around atoms and molecules. I get the s orbital. At least I think so. It forms a spherical shape around the nucleus of the atom. Now, that represents the general area of where the electron could be. Now as we move down the rows of the periodic table towards the right and have more and more valence electrons in the outer shell this changes to a p orbital. Also, let's forget about f and d orbitals for right now. The p orbitals have this weird baseball bat-like appearance. Now this is the representation for the general space of where those electrons in that valence shell could be. Am I right?

Yes. The orbital represents the area in which you can find the electron with 90% probability (i.e. 90% of the time, the electron will be in the baseball bat-like area).


Now when the electron moves through these "general spaces," they move in a wave format, hence the term wave function.

Correct. The wave-like nature of the electron is necessary to explain the fact that the electron can be on either side of the nucleus (in either lobe of the orbital), yet it is impossible to find the electron in the plane of the nucleus.
 
thanks.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top