Not sure what direction I'm heading in

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benzoate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced by a student pursuing research in astrophysics, specifically studying globular star clusters near black holes. The student expresses frustration over a lack of mentorship and guidance from their advisor, who is unresponsive and provides unclear explanations regarding the research code. This has led to feelings of inadequacy and confusion about understanding numerical methods in astrophysics simulations. The student is also uncertain about their specific interests within physics and feels unsupported in exploring different topics, despite actively seeking knowledge through library resources. Responses from others in the discussion emphasize that it's common for students to start research later in their academic careers and that focusing on coursework and grades is crucial at this stage. They reassure the student that there is ample time to determine their path in physics and that graduate programs typically begin with general courses before allowing for specialization.
Benzoate
Messages
418
Reaction score
0
I want to go to grad school to either study astrophysics or a topic in condensed matter physics . Its been two years and now I am just starting to do research in astrophysics studying studying globular star cluster over a black hole. I really haven't had a good mentor for my this research project. I probably would not have been able to work on the project I wanted to pursue if I did not walk into his office. He hardly ever responds to my emails that often, unlike most of the physics professors in the department. I know you should work independently on a given project. But he really doesn't sit down with you and tells you why the equations you written inside the code are wrong . He responds by telling me about what how the code should look , even when his explanations are not concise and seem unclear to me. I feel really useless and stupid because in all honesty, I really don't understand what the code really means. Is it normal not to understand the numerical methods when performing an astrophysics simulation for the first time? I really want to understand , my project.

Overall , I have received any real guidance from any professors what direction I should take that will enable me to walk on the right path to becoming a physicist;s Not even sure what physics topics I'd be interested in even if I were accepted into a physics grad program. I've gone to my college library just about every night checking books on different physics topics ranging from General Relativity to quantum computing, to Globular star clusters to atomic physics , to QED , to determined what physics topics interest me the most. These books have served somewhat as a guide for me , since I might so called physics advisor doesn't offer me any real advice. Nevertheless , books are not the best substitute compare to asking another professor about their experience finding out what they've want to pursue a career in as a physics major.

My advisor also did not encourage me as a freshman to do some research over the summer when I was a freshman . Now I'm just starting to developed my research experience in my late sophomore year.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are worrying unnecessarily. You will see what interests you as you take courses. Most people don't do research after freshman year. Grad school applications are over a year away, right now just focus on earning good grades, understanding the material, and your current research project.
 
Yeah you still have plenty of time to decide what to pursue after undergrad. as stated above, most students do not begin doing research until sophomore year or later.
Even once you get to grad school, you will take one year doing courses which are most likely general courses again like E&M, Mechanics... etc. then after those you begin to get more specialized.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
971
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top