Quote: "Let [tex]G = <N, (A_i), (u_i)> [/tex] be such a strategic game. We denote by [tex]\Delta (A_i )[/tex] the set of probability distributions over [tex]A_i[/tex] and refer to a member of [tex]\Delta (A_i )[/tex] as a mixed strategy of player i; we assume that the players' mixed strategies are independent randomizations. "(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

So notationally there is a difference between pure and mixed strategies; however, how does this translate to a physical difference between a pure and a mixed strategy? Where does the Delta notation come from? (I'm reading a really abstract book on game theory)

===

EDIT:

From http://www.virtualperfection.com/gametheory/1.StrategicFormGames.1.0.pdf ,

When A is a finite set, [tex]\Delta (A_i )[/tex] is the set of all probability distributions over A. So how then, would we list the set of all probability distributions over A? Is the set infinite? (because you can assign any probability from [0,1] to the elements of A, and the range of the set has an infinite number of elements)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Notation for mixed strategies in Game Theory

Loading...

Similar Threads - Notation mixed strategies | Date |
---|---|

I Question about simplifying Sigma notation | Feb 11, 2018 |

A Simmons notation for transfinite ordinals | Jan 12, 2018 |

I Counterexample Required (Standard Notations) | Jul 11, 2017 |

I Cryptography notation question | Feb 20, 2017 |

CDF of correlated mixed random variables | Dec 30, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**