Notation for Principal Square Root?

DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
Hello,

I was just wondering if there is a special notation for a principal square root...

I suppose using absolute value would work..
\left|\sqrt{9}\right|=+3

But it doesn't seem as fitting as an actual special square root symbol. Maybe something like this?
\sqrt[+]{9}=+3

Also, +\sqrt{x} could be ambiguous since it could mean +(\pm\sqrt{x})
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I always thought it correct to denote the principal square root as

\sqrt{9}=3

whereas both roots would be denoted as

\pm\sqrt{9}=\pm{3}
 
pbandjay said:
I always thought it correct to denote the principal square root as

\sqrt{9}=3

whereas both roots would be denoted as

\pm\sqrt{9}=\pm{3}

That's interesting...To me it would seem that when using the square root symbol in its purest form, it should denote the meaning of a square root in its purest form...and that would be to indicate that positive numbers have two roots, positive and negative.

In other words, it would make sense to me that the default interpretation of the symbol in its simplest form should be its meaning in its broadest sense (two roots).

But if that's the convention, that's the convention I suppose...
 
DocZaius said:
That's interesting...To me it would seem that when using the square root symbol in its purest form, it should denote the meaning of a square root in its purest form...and that would be to indicate that positive numbers have two roots, positive and negative.

\sqrt{x} is not defined to be simply the square root of x, but the principal square root of x so there is nothing "pure" about \sqrt{x}. pbandjay is right.

In other words, it would make sense to me that the default interpretation of the symbol in its simplest form should be its meaning in its broadest sense (two roots).
Actually what would make sense was for the default interpretation to be the easiest one to work with and the one you usually need. In many contexts there is no need to discriminate between \sqrt{x} and -\sqrt{x} so we only need one. When there is a need we just use the symbols \sqrt{x} and -\sqrt{x}. Attaching multiple values to \sqrt{x} means that you can't attach a unique value to expressions such as \sqrt{4} + 3 and when actually working with square roots this is often desirable.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top