Notation for special summations

  • Thread starter Thread starter epkid08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the notation for special summations involving multiple indices. It explores how to represent functions like g(x_n) with varying limits based on previous sums. For small, finite indexes, shorthand notation such as ∑_{i,j,k} f(x) is commonly used, while for variable indexes, a more structured approach like S_n = ∑_{i_1 ... i_n} f(x) is suggested. The conversation also addresses the need for notation that specifies each index running up to the previous one, proposing forms like S_3 = ∑^N_{i > j > k} a_{ijk}(x). Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of clarity in mathematical notation for complex summations.
epkid08
Messages
264
Reaction score
1
Is there special notation for a function like this:
g(x_1)=\sum^k_jf(x)

g(x_2)=\sum^p_k\sum^k_jf(x)

g(x_3)=\sum^s_p\sum^p_k\sum^k_jf(x)

If so, what would g(x_n) be?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I forgot to add, a function like this:

f(x_n)=\sum^{\sum^{\sum^{\sum^{\sum}}}}...

(the limit of each sum is another sum; fallowing the pattern in the above post of course)
 
For a small, finite number of indexes, sometimes I see the shorthand

\sum_{i,j,k} f(x)

This usually occurs when all of the indexes run from 0 to the same limit N.

If you have a variable number of indexes, then you can "index the indexes" as follows:

S_n = \sum_{i_1 \dots i_n} f(x)

Oh, wait, I see you want each index to run up to the previous index. For a small number of indexes, you can do

S_3 = \sum^N_{i > j > k} a_{ijk}(x)

And in general, you could probably write

S_n = \sum^N_{i_1 > \dots > i_n} a_{i_1 \dots i_n}(x)
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top