Notation regarding the dipole approximation

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

Whenever I read about the dipole approximation in QM, then the Hamiltonian is given as
<br /> \hat {V}_{\text{dipole}} = -\mathbf{d}\cdot \mathbf{E}<br />
where E is the electric field and d the dipole operator. What I am wondering about is that d is an operator. Is it wrong to include the hat in the interaction? As in
<br /> \hat {V}_{\text{dipole}} = -\hat{\mathbf{d}}\cdot \mathbf{E}<br />This is probably a silly question, but it is something that has been on my mind for some time.Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's normal to be pedantic about putting hats on operators when students are just starting to learn about them. Later on in the course they can distinguish operators from context, so they might get left off by laziness. In the case of the dipole operator above, it's also likely that putting the hat might cause some readers to believe that it refers to a unit vector, so it's reasonable to leave it off.
 
I see, thanks!
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top