- 3,157
- 57
"Arctic passage" (Part one) is starting just now. Franklin and his crew's attempt at the NorthWest passage. This is a GOOD repeat!
turbo-1 said:"Arctic passage" (Part one) is starting just now. Franklin and his crew's attempt at the NorthWest passage. This is a GOOD repeat!
cho: Ah, for just one time I would take the Northwest Passage
To find the hand of Franklin reaching for the Beaufort Sea;
Tracing one warm line through a land so wild and savage
And make a Northwest Passage to the sea.
turbo-1 said:I have a LOT of Rogers' music, and love this song (as well as most of his maritime stuff). He also invokes McKenzie and David Thompson in that song - Canada was REALLY wild and tough, and exploring it was made much more difficult than what became the US simply because the climate was so unforgiving to the unprepared.
Did you happen to hear any of his brother Garnett's music? Evidently he and Stan worked together, for some time.turbo-1 said:I have a LOT of Rogers' music, and love this song (as well as most of his maritime stuff).
turbo-1 said:For some enlightenment, I live south of the 45th North parallel (latitude) in forbidding territory that no European settler could possibly have survived without the aid of the native population and years of preparation (not possible then).
Look at some of the places in Europe that lie on the 45th parallel. No wonder so many colonists died. They thought they were moving to paradise.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/45th_parallel_north
They were confident in their ships, their supplies, and their technology, which were all inadequate to the task.Ouabache said:It would have made sense, to learn skills from those who live in that environment. Certainly, if they had befriended the Inuit & employed their arctic survival skills, history may have recorded a more successful outcome.
Then the British Admiralty appears very naive, considering Franklin had 1st hand knowledge of the hardships traversing the arctic maritimes. He almost died during his previous expedition.turbo-1 said:They were confident in their ships, their supplies, and their technology, which were all inadequate to the task.
It's my opinion (only) that the admiralty kept throwing technology at the problem to brute-force it. If the British had colonized (nicely) the northern extent of Canada, they could have easily gained access to the skills and knowledge of the Inuit within a few decades at most, and could have surveyed all of the (presumed) NW passage without risking ships and crews. Instead, they assumed that their "superiority" would carry the day. Bad choice.Ouabache said:Then the British Admiralty appears very naive, considering Franklin had 1st hand knowledge of the hardships traversing the arctic maritimes. He almost died during his last expedition.
You would think they include some logical contingency plans, in case the ships got stuck for an extended period. Or were they just cocky, like the designers of the Titanic.
Yes it was one of the first expeditions that carried tinned food. I don't have access to historical records just now, however wiki tells us they did not purchase their provisions from top-shelf suppliers. Though lead was certainly a bad choice of material, evidently the problem was poor process control.tribdog said:was this the expedition where they had canned food for the first time, unfortunately they used lead to seal the cans?
From wikipedia...
(They brought with them), three years' worth of conventionally preserved or tinned preserved food supplies. Unfortunately, the latter was supplied from a cut-rate provisioner who was awarded the contract only a few months before the ships were to sail. Though his "patent process" was sound, the haste with which he had prepared thousands of cans of food led to sloppily-applied beads of solder on the cans' interior edges and allowed lead to leach into the food.
I think you're right.turbo-1 said:It's my opinion (only) that the admiralty kept throwing technology at the problem to brute-force it. If the British had colonized (nicely) the northern extent of Canada, they could have easily gained access to the skills and knowledge of the Inuit within a few decades at most, and could have surveyed all of the (presumed) NW passage without risking ships and crews. Instead, they assumed that their "superiority" would carry the day. Bad choice.
Yes. All poorly-supplied, unreinforced cargo ships should take the NW passage to cut time off the Europe-to-Asia run, and to provide a steady larder to the Inuit who have enough sense to explore ice-bound ships.Ouabache said:I suspect somewhere in his final report was, yes there is a NW passage to the Pacific but not a recommended shortcut to Asia.![]()
I never saw Stan in concert and only caught glimpses of him here on the net. Have you watched the documentary about him, called http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uCFs06j7E8", The Legacy of Stan Rogers, made in 1989? You can view it on youtube in 6 parts.turbo-1 said:I have a LOT of Rogers' music, and love this song (as well as most of his maritime stuff). He also invokes McKenzie and David Thompson in that song - Canada was REALLY wild and tough, and exploring it was made much more difficult than what became the US simply because the climate was so unforgiving to the unprepared.
I don't remember the titles of all Stan's CD's that I have (they were all vinyl, at first, of course) because they are buried in the bowels of my 400-CD Sony changer. I have a live CD from Halifax, NS
I'll look for that. Thanks.Ouabache said:I never saw Stan in concert and only caught glimpses of him here on the net. Have you watched the documentary about him, called http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uCFs06j7E8", The Legacy of Stan Rogers, made in 1989? You can view it on youtube in 6 parts.