Novice question about heat, ZPE and HUP

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Hup
jackle
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was watching a pop-sci TV program on heat recently. Specifically, it was about trying to reach the lowest temperature possible. I was trying to recall something I learned about the uncertainty principle being a barrier to reaching absolute zero. When I searched on the internet I got some stuff back about zero point energies, but I could not work out how the concepts of heat, zero point energy and uncertainty fit together.

1) Does the uncertainty principle generate heat?

2) Is it theoretically possible to reach absolute zero?

3) Is a system at the zero point energy also at absolute zero?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jackle said:
Hi,

I was watching a pop-sci TV program on heat recently. Specifically, it was about trying to reach the lowest temperature possible. I was trying to recall something I learned about the HUP being a barrier to reaching absolute zero. When I searched on the internet I got some stuff back about zero point energies, but I could not work out how the concepts of heat, ZPE and uncertainty fit together.

1) Does the HUP generate heat?

2) Is it theoretically possible to reach absolute zero?

3) Is a system at the ZPE also at absolute zero?

Thanks

It would be helpful if you avoid using acronyms as much as possible, unless they are 100% commonly known (like USA). My guess is that you meant

HUP = Heisenberg uncertainty principle
ZPE = zero-point energy

Eugene.
 
You guessed right.

Sorry for being lazy, I have tried to put it right by editing the original post.
 
1) Not that I'm aware of.

2) No, but you can get asymptotically close.

3) ZPE is defined as the residual energy (potential + kinetic) due to quantum effects at 0 K. If it weren't for quantum effects- the system would have a lower potential energy (with a kinetic energy of zero). The difference between the system's actual energy and its hypothetical classical energy is the zero-point energy. i.e. the zero-point energy would be zero if the system were purely classical (hbar ->0).
 
jackle said:
2) Is it theoretically possible to reach absolute zero?

3) Is a system at the zero point energy also at absolute zero?

Thanks

In statistical quantum mechanics, a system is at temperature T if it is in a mixed state where all possible energy levels enter with their weights \exp(-E/kT). In principle, it is possible to prepare a macroscopic system (e.g., a piece of crystal) in a lowest energy pure quantum state. This would effectively mean that T=0. I think that superfluids or Bose-Einstein condensates also formally have T=0.

Eugene.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top