Nuclear Atom Theory - Check it Out

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a new nuclear atom theory proposed by rlduncan, suggesting that protons have two poles but cannot create their own negative side. The theory posits that when an electron enters orbit, the proton's positive side interacts with the electron's negative field, charging the proton's south pole negatively. This interaction leads to a dynamic where the proton can radiate both positive and negative fields, resulting in simultaneous attraction and repulsion of the electron. The conversation highlights the importance of experimental data to validate these theories, with an emphasis on how this could necessitate significant changes in scientific textbooks if proven correct. The charged ring model is mentioned as a relevant concept, linking the distance parameters of electron-proton interactions to geometric principles found in Pascal's Triangle. The thread encourages further examination and discussion within the scientific community.
rlduncan
Messages
104
Reaction score
1
A new nuclear atom theory at www.svcc.edu/~duncanb/[/URL] . Feel free to visit and make comments. Reply in forum or leave email. Will appreciate all comments.

rlduncan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
how about the proton has two poles but can't create its own negative side,when a electron comes into orbit,the proton positive side pulls the negative filed of the electron through its pole,then charges the south pole with a negative field,then when the field strong enough the proton radiates both a positive and negative field with the use of the electrons own field,thus repelling and attracting at the same time.so the closer the electron gets the stronger the negative field gets repelling it back harder by its own field being used against itself!
 
It would be interesting to see the experimental data which led you to your various theories.
 
I agree the electron is held at distance from the proton. I like the charged ring model because the parameters that describe this distance are the same as those of convex polyhedra which led to this modeling technique associated with Pascal's Triangle. Check out 4 th reference in J. Chem. Ed.
 
Last edited:
Nuclea Atom

Which experimental data can I help with. I am hoping to encourage the scientific community to exam this closely. If this theory is correct then textbooks will have to be rewritten.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top