Nuclear Bomb & Missile Delivery: Urgent Help Needed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a third-year Maths student's presentation on the atomic bomb, emphasizing the need for mathematical perspectives on topics like blast radius and missile trajectories. Suggestions include exploring G.I. Taylor's dimensional analysis for estimating blast radius and examining rocket propulsion dynamics related to missile trajectories. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the equations governing missile motion, particularly in the context of mass loss during propulsion. Additional resources, such as the high energy weapons page from the Nuclear Weapon Archive, are recommended for further research. The thread underscores the challenge of finding mathematical frameworks related to nuclear weapons.
uraknai
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

as part of my third year degree in Maths I have to give a 10 minute oral presentation of the atom bomb :eek: . I'll start off by quickly giving a historical overview of the experiments that led up to the discovery of radioactivity and the model of the atom etc and then intend to focus on about 2 or 3 main areas.

I was thinking about talking about some equations that approximate blast radius and damage etc and also do some work on trajectories which would have been inportant for intercontinental missiles during the Cold War. The problem I have is that I really can't find anything about the A-Bomb from a mathematical view point.

Can someone please give me a point in the right direction with a few useful links and helpful advice. Also, is there any other topic that I could explore associated with the a-bomb from a strictly mathematical stand.

Cheers :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dig up G.I. Taylor's dimensional analysis solution for the blast radius. From that he approximated the released energy. Or something like that. I heard that example on a course a couple of years ago so I'm not sure on the details. Try googling the relevant terms.
 
I think , starting with some simplicity , if you know complete dynamics about the trajectory of rocket propulsion, it will help , I an atom bomb , fission takes place and if you take that mass is exhausted by the missile carrying the atom bomb , it almost resembles a rocket trajectory .

As the mass is emitted by the missile , the missile carrying the atom bomb goes forward.The equation is given by:

<br /> <br /> F_ext = M_o \frac{dv}{dt} + V_r \frac {dM}{dt}<br />

Where V_r is the relative velocity between exhaust gases and the missile .

dM/dt = Change in mass of the rocket with time...

You can also add the effects of "g" on the missile by taking the F_ext
in context with "g"

==============================================================

I will try to chalk out some more for you ...give me some time..
 
Try the high energy weapons page

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/

I believe it's under "effects", but I didn't double check. The whole page is a good resource for your subject.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top