Nuclear charge and atomic orbitals

kthejohnster
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
If I use hydrogen-like orbitals for other atoms, how are the number of nodes and probability density affected?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you are considering one-electron atoms (or negelcting electron-electron interactions), then the only difference is in a scaling factor for ##r## that depends on ##Z##. Note that this scaling factor also depends on the mass of the nucleus (if you are not considering an infinitely heavy nucleus).
 
For other atoms (more than one electron), the number of nodes of the H-like orbitals should be fine, but the probability density would be just wrong. Using hydrogen-like orbitals for anything else than hydrogen and helium is highly NOT recommended! As least not if you care about the results you get.

If you need a proper approximation of the orbitals, you can use the AO functions of a generally contracted Gaussian basis set from quantum chemistry. For example, the ANO-RCC sets should be very accurate and useful for such a purpose. Depending on your case, much smaller Gaussian sets might also do the trick. (but stay away from STO-anything sets--these are even worse than using H-orbitals).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top