Nuclear Engineering: PhD & Job Prospects

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the prospects of pursuing a PhD or job in nuclear engineering for individuals with a background in nuclear physics. Participants explore the transition from nuclear physics to nuclear engineering, the relevance of specific courses, and the job market for graduates in these fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is considering a master's in nuclear physics and questions the job prospects in nuclear engineering with that degree.
  • Another participant, an undergrad in nuclear engineering, suggests that job prospects are good but notes that some with PhDs in physics have switched to nuclear engineering due to job difficulties.
  • There is a discussion about the possibility of obtaining a master's in nuclear engineering after completing a master's in nuclear physics, with concerns about lacking engineering background.
  • Some participants mention the need for prerequisite courses to transition from physics to engineering, with specific courses like Thermal Hydraulics and Heat Transfer being highlighted.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the specific courses required for the transition and seek information on typical prerequisites for nuclear engineering master's programs.
  • There is a mention of a postgraduate program that may not cover nuclear fusion, raising questions about available options in Europe for further studies in fusion engineering.
  • Some participants discuss the idea that a master's in physics should allow for entry into a nuclear engineering master's program, with only a few undergraduate courses needed to bridge the gap.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the job market and the transition from nuclear physics to nuclear engineering. There is no consensus on the specific courses required or the overall feasibility of this transition.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the admission requirements for master's programs can vary and that specific courses may be applicant-specific, leading to uncertainty about what is necessary for a successful transition.

  • #31
I score average about 13/20 on my exams, so according to http://www.foreigncredits.com/Resources/GPA-Calculator/Belgium that gives me a GPA of only 2.0. A 13.6/20 average would make me eligible for a PhD at my department (if I find a promotor).

If I fail to get at least a 3.0 GPA it's probably not a good idea to go for a university in the US, because the decent ones probably won't let me in? Anyway I find plenty of programs on fission, but not for fusion so suggestions are welcome.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
You'll notice that calculator is very crude. Having experienced the Belgian system at your university (well, one semester only, so take it for what it's worth), along with another European and now Canadian system, I'd say 13/20 is a bit harder to get than a C average (i.e. 2.0). It's still not the greatest grade, unforunately, so I can't really say how competitive it makes you.

Again, this is all anecdotal, I just know the Belgian system (same goes for the French one, from what I hear) is tougher on the grades than the Canadian/US system. You probably know of no one that has a 20/20 or even a 19/20 average, while there's always people at universities with 4.0 GPAs. The material can be equally as tough elsewhere, but the grades just seem to be skewed towards the low end in Belgium.
 
  • #33
Ryker said:
You'll notice that calculator is very crude. Having experienced the Belgian system at your university (well, one semester only, so take it for what it's worth), along with another European and now Canadian system, I'd say 13/20 is a bit harder to get than a C average (i.e. 2.0). It's still not the greatest grade, unforunately, so I can't really say how competitive it makes you.

Again, this is all anecdotal, I just know the Belgian system (same goes for the French one, from what I hear) is tougher on the grades than the Canadian/US system. You probably know of no one that has a 20/20 or even a 19/20 average, while there's always people at universities with 4.0 GPAs. The material can be equally as tough elsewhere, but the grades just seem to be skewed towards the low end in Belgium.

And probably the US universities will be aware of this situation? Do letters of recommendation really count or is there always a first selection on grades and afterwards they read the letters?

As for the grades, I know only one person who's had a 20/20 for an exam (he actually had almost every exam period multiple 20's). He graduated with I believe about a 19/20 average. Apart from that the most brilliant people I know have about 16/20 average.
 
  • #34
eXorikos said:
And probably the US universities will be aware of this situation?
I have no idea. I imagine they are to an extent, but I'm pretty sure they aren't aware of all or even most of it. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if they were only aware that the difference exists, and maybe compare your grades to those of previous successful applicants from Belgium. This is all a guess, but it doesn't seem unreasonable.

So if you're applying to US universities, you have the average itself going against you, since numerically speaking, it's low. I think you need to convince them that it's not because you're at the low end of a curve, but that the peak itself is skewed to the left. I did the same when applying to Master's programs in the UK, although even strictly from a numerical standpoint, my GPA wasn't bad by any means. This was in a different field, so I don't know how it would translate to Physics, but since we're talking about general knowledge of systems, I think it would quite well.
eXorikos said:
As for the grades, I know only one person who's had a 20/20 for an exam (he actually had almost every exam period multiple 20's). He graduated with I believe about a 19/20 average. Apart from that the most brilliant people I know have about 16/20 average.
Yeah, that's what I heard when I was in Belgium, as well.
 
  • #35
I still haven't received a reply from the professor, but I found extra documentation myself. Apparently the courses are:
1. - Electrical engineering and energy, 6 ECTS
2. - Numerical analysis, 5 ECTS – not for master math
3. - System analysis and control theory, 6 ECTS
4. - Material science part 2, 6 ECTS
5. - Thermodynamics and turbomachines, 7 ECTS
6. - Heat transfer and fluidum mechanics, 7 ECTS
7. - Mechanics for engineers, 5 ECTS

As a physics student I don't see why I should take mechanics and numerical analysis though. These courses don't seem very exciting. The program itself still is very interesting though. It is a part of the European Nuclear Education Network.
 

Similar threads

What's the best major between Physics & Chemistry for entering MS in Nuclear Engineering?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Need study advice before starting a Masters program in Nuclear Engineering
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Is a nuclear engineering minor worth an extra semester?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Next steps toward my PhD in research in Nuclear Medicine and Physics
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Schools Which College Should I Choose for a Career in Fusion System Design?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Programs Pros and Cons of Nuclear Engineering
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Other Can a Physics Graduate Successfully Transition to Nuclear Engineering?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Hi! I'm doing BSc.(Honors) Physics Degree in Sri Lanka ( USJP). SayHi☺
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
How do i get a nuclear engineering degree
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Aeronautical Engineering or Nuclear Engineering?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K