Nuclear equations and conservation of charge

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
tsutsuji
Gold Member
Messages
1,219
Reaction score
15
Do you know why in most textbooks, like on http://www.lbl.gov/abc/Basic.html or http://books.google.com/books?id=xD0AwBQECasC&pg=PA196 beta decay equations are written like

[itex]^{14}_{6}C\rightarrow^{14}_{7}N+e^{-}+\overline{\nu}_{e}[/itex]

instead of

[itex]^{14}_{6}C\rightarrow^{14}_{7}N^{+}+e^{-}+\overline{\nu}_{e}[/itex]

Wouldn't the latter be more correct as regards conservation of charge ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tsutsuji said:
Do you know why in most textbooks, like on http://www.lbl.gov/abc/Basic.html or http://books.google.com/books?id=xD0AwBQECasC&pg=PA196 beta decay equations are written like

[itex]^{14}_{6}C\rightarrow^{14}_{7}N+e^{-}+\overline{\nu}_{e}[/itex]

instead of

[itex]^{14}_{6}C\rightarrow^{14}_{7}N^{+}+e^{-}+\overline{\nu}_{e}[/itex]

Wouldn't the latter be more correct as regards conservation of charge ?

I usually see it written as

[itex]^{14}_{6}C\rightarrow^{14}_{7}N+^{ 0}_{-1}e+^{0}_{0}\overline{\nu}_{e}[/itex]
 
The equation is discussing the nucleus, not the atom. So no need to put a + in front of the N.
 
completely agree with Vanadium... the + is included in the 7 of Nitrogen
 
Thanks for all the replies.