Nuclides: Highest or Lowest Binding Energy Most Stable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tandoorichicken
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the stability of nuclides in relation to their binding energy. It is established that nuclides with higher binding energy are generally more stable because they release more energy when nucleons come together, resulting in a lower energy state. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding this concept for solving more complex problems in nuclear physics. The conversation also includes a reference to a resource for further exploration of binding energy. Overall, higher binding energy correlates with greater stability in nuclides.
tandoorichicken
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
Out of a set of nuclides, is the one with the highest or lowest binding energy the most stable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think and why? We can only help if you show your work first.
 
This isn't the actual homework question, I just need to be sure in order to do a more complicated problem. My guess is that the more stable nuclides would have a higher binding energy, so that they give off more energy when coming together, hence having the lowest possible energy when the dust settles. But then, I might have completely missed the mark.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top