Nuclides: Highest or Lowest Binding Energy Most Stable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tandoorichicken
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the stability of nuclides in relation to their binding energy. It is established that nuclides with higher binding energy are generally more stable because they release more energy when nucleons come together, resulting in a lower energy state. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding this concept for solving more complex problems in nuclear physics. The conversation also includes a reference to a resource for further exploration of binding energy. Overall, higher binding energy correlates with greater stability in nuclides.
tandoorichicken
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
Out of a set of nuclides, is the one with the highest or lowest binding energy the most stable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think and why? We can only help if you show your work first.
 
This isn't the actual homework question, I just need to be sure in order to do a more complicated problem. My guess is that the more stable nuclides would have a higher binding energy, so that they give off more energy when coming together, hence having the lowest possible energy when the dust settles. But then, I might have completely missed the mark.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top