Number of resistors for potential divider?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum number of identical resistors required to achieve a specific voltage across a voltmeter in a circuit with a unit E.M.F. It highlights that while any fraction p/q can be created using q resistors in series, this method does not always yield the smallest number of resistors. Examples provided illustrate specific voltages and their corresponding resistor counts, revealing patterns such as the relationship between x=a/b and x=(b-a)/b. The findings suggest that for certain fractions, particularly when the denominator is prime, a specific number of resistors is necessary. Overall, the complexity of finding the minimum number of resistors for various voltage values is emphasized.
cubzar
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Not sure whether to post in mathematics or physics section.

A circuit contains a cell of unit E.M.F. Use any combination of identical resistors in series and/or parrallel in order to create a voltage of x across a voltmeter connected anywhere on the circuit. Assume that there is no internal resistance or resistance in the wires, and the voltmeter does not draw any current. What is the easiest way to find the minimum number of resistors required for a given value of x (x<1 and x is rational, otherwise there is no solution)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You lost me
 
I don't think there is an easy way to find the minimum numbers. You can make any fraction p/q, with q resistors in series, where you connect the voltmeter across p of them, but this is not always the smallest number.

with four resistances you can make a voltage of 1/5 by putting 2 in series to get a 2 ohm resistance, and 2 in parallel to get 1/2 ohm. If you make a voltage divider from 2 ohm and 1/2 ohm you get 1/2 / (2 + 1/2) = 1/5.
 
The only pattern I could be sure of is that the numbers of resistors for x=a/b is the same as for x=(b-a)/b. It also looks like b resistors are required when x=1/b and b is prime.
A few values I have found:
voltage no. of resistors
1/2 2
1/3 3
1/4 4
1/5 5
2/5 4
1/6 4
1/7 7
2/7 5
3/7 5
1/8 8
3/8 7
1/10 5
2/13 8
7/13 7
2/19 19
19/23 13
2/31 17
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top