Numerical Methods vs Differential Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the importance of mathematical knowledge, specifically differential equations and numerical methods, for computer science students. A participant expresses concern about their math background and seeks advice on which area is more beneficial for a computer science career. The consensus suggests that numerical methods are more relevant, as they involve programming and algorithmic problem-solving. However, it's noted that jobs requiring expertise in these areas often cater to scientists and engineers rather than pure computer science graduates. To enhance employability, it is recommended to consider studying both subjects, as this could prevent potential job selection issues in the future.
Monte_Carlo
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I'm currently in computer science program and I have an urgent feeling that I need better exposure to math. I have taken Discrete Math, Calculus i, ii, iii and I've independently studied linear algebra. I guess my concern is lack of differential equations and numerical methods. In your experience, what jobs with computer science orientation require knowledge of numerical methods and differential equations?

Thanks,

Monte
 
Physics news on Phys.org
both of those are related to engineering
 
Ok but which one is better for computer science major?
 
probably numerical methods, since you would be using a computer / algorithms to approximate solutions to certain types of problems
 
Monte_Carlo said:
Ok but which one is better for computer science major?
Numerical methods is inevitably going to be closer to programming, and may well involve programming.


Monte_Carlo said:
In your experience, what jobs with computer science orientation require knowledge of numerical methods and differential equations?
You're talking about jobs that typically go to scientists and engineers who have a bit of a background in computer science. It's pretty rare for those jobs to go to computer science majors. If you are applying for such jobs, you had better hope that the automated filtering software has ways for you to identify keywords that will keep your resume from being filed circularly.
 
What's wrong with doing both? Does it cost you a fortune to do both?
If you think there is a chance that in the future you will not be selected for the job because you lack experience in one of these fields, then play it safe and do both.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top