Stability Analysis for Nyquist Criteria Homework Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the Nyquist criteria for stability analysis in control systems. Participants clarify that Nyquist is an open-loop stability criterion, focusing on the open-loop transfer function G(s) rather than closed-loop poles. The key point is that stability is determined by the encirclement of the point -1 + j0 in the complex plane, not the origin. There is confusion regarding the interpretation of the characteristic equation and the relevance of closed-loop poles, with consensus that the analysis should strictly involve open-loop functions. Ultimately, the correct approach involves determining the real and imaginary parts of G(s) and following Nyquist's rules for stability assessment.
jaus tail
Messages
613
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-9_17-33-11.png
[/B]

Homework Equations


Number of encirclements = Number of open loop poles - Number of Close loop poles on Right side of S plane.

The Attempt at a Solution


There is 1 open loop pole on RHS
For Close loop poles I used Routh Herwitz method and got 1 pole on RHS. 1 sign change.
So I get N = 0.
Where am I wrong?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-9_17-32-59.png
    upload_2017-12-9_17-32-59.png
    32.1 KB · Views: 570
  • upload_2017-12-9_17-33-11.png
    upload_2017-12-9_17-33-11.png
    6.7 KB · Views: 1,007
Physics news on Phys.org
jaus tail said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 216387[/B]

Homework Equations


Number of encirclements = Number of open loop poles - Number of Close loop poles on Right side of S plane.
Why are you trying to deal with closed-loop poles? Nyquist is strictly an open-loop stability criterion. G(s) is the open-loop transfer function.
 
rude man said:
Why are you trying to deal with closed-loop poles? Nyquist is strictly an open-loop stability criterion. G(s) is the open-loop transfer function.
Nyquist criteria says encirclement of -1 + j0 is number of open loop poles - series of characteristic equation.
Characteristic equation is 1 + G(s)
 
jaus tail said:
Nyquist criteria says encirclement of -1 + j0 is number of open loop poles - series of characteristic equation.
Characteristic equation is 1 + G(s)
What do you mean by "series of characteristic equation"?
The Nyquist method does not involve closed-loop transfer functions.
Nyquist determines whether the closed-loop transfer function is stable but its methodology does not involve any closed-loop transfer functions.
 
I see from your attachment that in some cases they do consider closed-loop RHS poles, in others they stick to open-loop only.
I have to admit I never heard of doing Nyquist analysis with anything other than open-loop transfer functions. Seems to me undesirable to have to compute 1 + G(s).
So the only way I know to do this is
(1) determine the Re and Im parts of G
(2) draw polar plot of G
(3) follow rules of Nyquist stability determination.
Sorry that's all I can tell you.
 
  • Like
Likes jaus tail
Sorry for the typo. It was 'zeroes' of characteristic equation and not 'series'. But yeah you're right. I read the question wrong. It says encircle the origin and not encircle -1
 
jaus tail said:
Sorry for the typo. It was 'zeroes' of characteristic equation and not 'series'. But yeah you're right. I read the question wrong. It says encircle the origin and not encircle -1
OK. I have to admit I don't know on what basis the solution to ex. 39 is given.
If G(s) is an open-loop transfer function then the thing that matters for determining stability of G(s)+1 is encirclement of G(s) of (-1,0), not (0,0). In other words, I guess I really don't understand their reasoning.
 
  • Like
Likes jaus tail
Back
Top