Object floating on the surface of water

AI Thread Summary
To describe the shape of a water surface deformed by a tiny floating object due to surface tension, a function f[x,y,z] can be utilized, focusing on balancing pressure as dictated by Laplace's equation. The deformation of the surface is influenced by hydrostatic and contact line forces, with the boundary condition defined by the contact angle. This phenomenon is related to the concept of a meniscus, which is a well-studied problem in fluid mechanics. References to relevant literature are provided for further exploration of the topic. The discussion highlights a lack of engagement on this specific question despite its scientific significance.
xyd
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
How to use a function f[x,y,z] to describe the shape of water surface when a tiny object is floating on it based on surface tension ONLY?

Assume there is a tiny object floating on the water surface because of the surface tension, then the water surface will be deformed obviously. So how can we use a function f[x,y,z] to describe the shape of water surface? (x,y,z) is a set of coordinate system of 3D space.
 

Attachments

  • Surface_Tension_Diagram.png
    Surface_Tension_Diagram.png
    2 KB · Views: 520
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
AFAIK, this is a solved problem (it's a meniscus) even though I can't find a reference... interesting

The idea is to balance the pressure: the surface will deform in accordance with Laplace's equation (\Delta P = -\sigma\kappa), and the boundary condition is given by the contact angle. The pressure is given by hydrostatic and contact line forces.

This reference may be a useful starting point:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/ux52v7274110l023/

Or this:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WHR-4CX72MT-NR&_user=7774119&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F1990&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1276525828&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000062847&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=7774119&md5=888045530331985fdc846499027a23cd
 
Hey, why no one seems interested in this question?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top