Object rotation about a fixed axis? question about derivatives in this problem?

AI Thread Summary
An object rotates about a fixed axis with its angular position described by θ=0.40e^(2t). The discussion centers on understanding how derivatives relate to angular velocity and acceleration, with the first derivative yielding angular velocity (ω) and the second derivative yielding angular acceleration (α). The tangential component of acceleration is calculated using the formula that relates angular acceleration to linear acceleration at a constant radius. Clarifications are provided regarding the interpretation of θ as the total rotation of the object over time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of derivatives in analyzing rotational motion.
nchin
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
Object rotation about a fixed axis?? question about derivatives in this problem??

An object rotates about a fixed axis, and the angular position of a reference line on the object is given by θ=0.40e^(2t), where θ is in radians and t is in seconds. Consider a point on the object that is 4.0 cm from the axis of rotation. At t = 0, what are the magnitudes of the point's tangential component of acceleration and radial component of acceleration?

solution is on bottom of page 2 and top of page 3 # HRW 10.25

http://www.nvcc.edu/home/tstantcheva/231files/hrwch10hw.pdf

I have three questions:

1. for part (a), I don't understand how taking the derivative twice gets you alpha? Why is that?

2. for part (b), why does taking the derivative only once gets you the angular velocity (ω)?

3. Also, the angular position which is θ=0.40e^(2t), is that how much the object rotated?

thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Differentiating theta once gives you the rate of change of angle, i.e. the angular velocity; a second time gives you the angular acceleration. For constant radius, the linear acceleration in the tangential direction is given by angular acceleration * radius. (If the radius is also changing there's an r-dot*theta-dot term.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top