Objects in Space: Does Microgravity Change the Rules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oumaima1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
AI Thread Summary
In microgravity, objects moving at the same speed and direction do not harm each other, as they are not converging. However, if the objects have mass, they exert a gravitational attraction that could lead to orbital interactions or convergence under certain conditions. The discussion highlights that significant mass is required for gravitational forces to outweigh electric forces, which typically prevent smaller objects from coalescing. The distinction between microgravity in outer space and other environments is clarified, emphasizing the unique dynamics at play. Understanding these principles is crucial for comprehending interactions between celestial bodies in space.
oumaima1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello ,i was reading a physics book and a question came up to my mind,i'm a high school student..About the rule : If objects are moving in the same speed and line,they'll cause no harm to each others..Is this rule the same in microgravity? I suppose some objects will be damaged..:)
Thank you in advance,
Have a nice day,
Ps:sorry ,for my weak english skills!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi and welcome.
If two objects are moving at the same velocity then they are not (by definition) converging so they cannot damage each other. If they have mass then they will have a finite attraction force between them and their paths will converge or they may actually orbit each other, depending on the exact circs..
Is that what you refer to as "micro gravity"?
Could you refine your question please? (Your English skills are quite OK! God you should see some of the sloppy posts some lazy people hit us with.)
 
I meant with ''micro gravity'' the outer space :) , I got your answer..
Yes,that's what i was refering..
Thank you very much ,Sophiecentaur..^^
 
Objects need to be very massive before the gravitational forces are significant compared with the electric forces that give them strength. Two small planets would eventually coalesc but two rocks never would. I'm not sure where the crossover lies. . . .
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Back
Top