Oblique incidence for Electromagnetic Waves

AI Thread Summary
In discussions about oblique incidence for electromagnetic waves, the choice of direction for the electric field (E) can initially seem confusing. The E field must be polarized parallel to the plane of incidence, allowing for two potential orientations. Consistency is crucial; if the magnetic field (B) is defined as k x E, the chosen direction for E should align with this relationship. If calculations yield a negative E, it indicates that the actual direction is opposite to the assumed one. Ultimately, the choice of E direction does not affect the final results as long as consistency is maintained throughout the analysis.
barnflakes
Messages
156
Reaction score
4
I'm a bit confused, when drawing the diagram for oblique incidence, how do I choose which way to draw the electric field? For example, I know the direction of the wave is in the plane of incidence and the wave vectors are simply arrows in the direction of the wave that I draw - and that the E field is polarised parallel to the plane, but that gives two directions for which I can choose E - how do I know which one? Does it just not make a difference when all is worked out in the end?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since E oscillates, you can choose either direction for the incident E arrow in your diagram, but you have to be consistent.
 
clem said:
Since E oscillates, you can choose either direction for the incident E arrow in your diagram, but you have to be consistent.

Thank you clem, however just looking at Griffiths book he has chosen two of the E fields to point to the right of the k vector and one to the left, that's not consistent?
 
I meant consistent with that you put the B vector as kXE. If the algebra gives you a negative E, that just means it points opposite to your assumed direction.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top