Obtain distance versus time from a speed vs distance plot.

  • Thread starter Thread starter lostidentity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plot Speed Time
AI Thread Summary
To convert speed versus distance data into a distance versus time plot, the relationship between distance and time must be established, even without known start and end times. The equation dx/dt = u(x) indicates that velocity is a function of distance, complicating the direct calculation of time. Suggestions include identifying points where speed remains constant to estimate time-steps based on distance measurements. Additionally, using numerical methods like the trapezoidal rule can help approximate the integral, but accurate time limits are necessary for proper calculations. Ultimately, obtaining time data is crucial for creating a valid distance versus time representation.
lostidentity
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a set of experimental data given in terms of speed u versus distance x. But I want to obtain a plot of distance x versus time t. The problem is I don't have the end time of the experiment. In this experiment velocity is a function of distance, u=u(x) and distance is in turn of time, x=x(t).

\frac{dx(t)}{dt} = u(x)

Is this possible without knowing the start and times?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
do you know the time-step of the measurements? I think that would help a lot.

Otherwise, you can probably get a couple of points from your data where the speed did not change and given the distance between points, you may be able to deduce the time-step...then, you may be able to simply have another x-axis that represent time?
 
If you write that with the variables separated:
\frac {dx}{u(x)} = 1\, dt
couldn't you approximate the integral on the left with, for example, the trapezoidal rule using your information (x0,u0),(x1,u1),...(xn,un)? But as someone else has observed, it looks like you need the times the data are recorded to put appropriate limits on the right side.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top