Obtaining a normalized PDF from a histogram?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dipole
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Histogram Pdf
AI Thread Summary
To obtain a normalized probability density function (PDF) from a histogram, one must divide the frequency counts by the total number of counts, resulting in an approximation of the underlying PDF. To derive an explicit form for the PDF, curve fitting techniques can be employed. If the distribution type is known (such as binomial or normal), the mean and variance should be estimated and used to define the specific parameters. In cases where the distribution is unknown, a general curve fitting approach should be applied, ensuring that the integral of the fitted curve equals one. This process effectively transforms the normalized histogram into a usable PDF.
dipole
Messages
553
Reaction score
151
Suppose I have a regular histogram, I can normalize it by dividing the frequency counts by the total number of counts (at least I believe that's all you need to do).

What you're left with should be an approximation to the underlying PDF (probability density function). What I'm asking is how does one obtain an explicit form for the PDF from your normalized histogram?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Essentially it is a curve fitting problem. If you know the type of distribution (e.g. binomial, Poisson, normal, etc.), estimate the mean and variance from the data and use the type with specific parameters. Otherwise, fit a curve and make sure the integral of the fit = 1.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top