Odd or Even Power? Examining f(x)=x^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter thereddevils
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even Power
AI Thread Summary
Functions of the form f(x) = x^(3/2) and f(x) = x^(1/2) are classified as neither even nor odd. The graph of f(x) = x^(1/2) resembles a sideways parabola with the lower half removed, while f(x) = x^(3/2) is known as a semicubical parabola. When the exponent is a rational number with a numerator of 1, such as 1/2 or 1/3, the graph typically appears as a one-sided parabola opening to the right. However, the graph of f(x) = x^(1/3) does not fit this description. Understanding these characteristics helps clarify the behavior of such functions.
thereddevils
Messages
436
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I know for graphs of function f(x)=x^n where n is an odd power, even power or square root have their own pattern but how about

f(x)=x^(3/2)

or f(x)=x^(1/2)

is that considered odd or even ?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, 3/2 and 1/2 are neither even or odd. There isn't exactly a simple rule for f(x) = x^(3/2), but it is a famous curve called http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SemicubicalParabola.html"

You can think of f(x) = x^(1/2) as a parabola tipped on its side, and then the bottom half is chopped off so that it's a function.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gib Z said:
No, 3/2 and 1/2 are neither even or odd. There isn't exactly a simple rule for f(x) = x^(3/2), but it is a famous curve called http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SemicubicalParabola.html"

You can think of f(x) = x^(1/2) as a parabola tipped on its side, and then the bottom half is chopped off so that it's a function.

thanks, i have tried graphing several such graphs with a program and notice something.

Any function f(x)=x^n , where n is 1/2, 1/3 (the denominator can be any real and the numerator is 1), the graph will look like a one-sided parabola opening to the right

And if n=3/2, 5/2, 7/3 (any rational numbers aside from case 1)

the graph will look like a semicubical parabola.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thereddevils said:
thanks, i have tried graphing several such graphs with a program and notice something.

Any function f(x)=x^n , where n is 1/2, 1/3 (the denominator can be any real and the numerator is 1), the graph will look like a one-sided parabola opening to the right
Err, not quite. The graph of f(x) = x^{1/3} does NOT look like a one-sided parabola opening to the right.

The function f(x) = x^{2} is a parabola, but it is not one-to-one. If we restrict the domain of f(x) to [0, ∞), then f(x) would be one-to-one and the inverse would be f^{-1}(x) = x^{1/2} = \sqrt{x}. So the graph of f^{-1}(x) would be a half-of-a-parabola laying on its side.

Now, the function g(x) = x^{3}, your basic cubic, IS one-to-one, so we don't need to restrict the domain. It's inverse would be g^{-1}(x) = x^{1/3} = \sqrt[3]{x}, and its graph would look like the COMPLETE graph of g(x) = x^{3}, but rotated to the side and flipped, for a lack of a better desciption.69
 
eumyang said:
Err, not quite. The graph of f(x) = x^{1/3} does NOT look like a one-sided parabola opening to the right.

The function f(x) = x^{2} is a parabola, but it is not one-to-one. If we restrict the domain of f(x) to [0, ∞), then f(x) would be one-to-one and the inverse would be f^{-1}(x) = x^{1/2} = \sqrt{x}. So the graph of f^{-1}(x) would be a half-of-a-parabola laying on its side.

Now, the function g(x) = x^{3}, your basic cubic, IS one-to-one, so we don't need to restrict the domain. It's inverse would be g^{-1}(x) = x^{1/3} = \sqrt[3]{x}, and its graph would look like the COMPLETE graph of g(x) = x^{3}, but rotated to the side and flipped, for a lack of a better desciption.


69

yeah that's only when the denominator is odd. Thanks.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top