Odds of Manchester United vs Aston Villa in FA Cup 3rd Round

  • Thread starter Thread starter billiards
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Manchester United has been drawn against Aston Villa in the FA Cup 3rd round four times in the last seven draws, raising questions about the odds of this occurrence. The calculated probability of this specific matchup happening is approximately 1 in 472,216. The method involves determining the chance of drawing Villa four times and not drawing them three times, factoring in the different permutations of these outcomes. Additionally, the likelihood of any team drawing another team four times in seven draws is about 1 in 7,495, while the chance of at least one team drawing another team four times is roughly 1 in 242. These calculations highlight the rarity of such matchups in the FA Cup.
billiards
Messages
765
Reaction score
16
A friend recently observed that Manchester United have been drawn against Aston Villa in The 3rd round of the FA Cup 4 times in the past 7 draws. There are 64 teams in the 3rd round draw. What are the odds of this happening?

I believe I have the answer, but I need someone to verify my answer to ensure that my understanding is correct.

So, what are the odds?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Okay, obviously this is too easy a question to bother most of you. My answer was 1/472,216. Is that right?
 
Actually, I think the problem is here

I believe I have the answer, but I need someone to verify my answer to ensure that my understanding is correct.

If you want to make sure your understanding is correct, the best way is surely to post what you think the correct method would be
 
Okay.

Chance of Man U drawing Villa on one occasion A = 1/63
Chance of that not happening on same occasion B = 62/63

Chance of it happening 4 times in a row followed by 3 failures is AAAABBB=623/637.

This probability is equal to the probability of the initial condition being satisfied (that Manu draw Vill 4 times in 7), by each of the 7!/(4!*3!) = 35 different possible permeatations. Accounting for all possible solutions, the probability that the initial condition is satisfied, is 35 times 623/637 = 1/472,216.
 
Looks good to me
 
I get 35*62^3/63^7 = 1191640/562711519881, but that's close enough to your answer.

Note that the chance of Man U drawing some team 4 times out of 7 (not just Villa in particular) is 1191640/8931928887, which at roughly 1/7495 is a fair bit more likely. The chance of it happening to at least one team (not just Man U) is about 1/242. The chance of at least one team pulling some other team at least 4 times is little changed at about 1/238.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top