Off-axis magnetic field due to a current loop in cartesian coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on transforming the magnetic field expressions of a current loop from cylindrical to Cartesian coordinates, specifically addressing the challenges of incorporating elliptic integrals. The user seeks guidance on whether to derive the entire expression from scratch or to utilize existing cylindrical coordinates. A suggestion is made to express the field in spherical coordinates and apply the spherical harmonic addition and translation theorems, as referenced in Steinborn and Ruedenberg's work. Additionally, a paper is mentioned that presents both spherical and Cartesian expressions for the current loop, prompting further inquiry into the derivation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields generated by current loops
  • Familiarity with elliptic integrals of the first and second kind
  • Knowledge of spherical harmonics and their theorems
  • Proficiency in coordinate transformations in electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of magnetic fields in spherical coordinates
  • Research the spherical harmonic addition and translation theorems
  • Examine the paper by Steinborn and Ruedenberg for insights on transformations
  • Explore methods for converting elliptic integrals into Cartesian coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism, particularly those interested in magnetic field calculations and coordinate transformations.

johnpatitucci
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi there,


a few days ago I derived the probably well-know expression for the magnetic field of a current loop including elliptic integrals of the first and second kind (it can be seen here http://plasmalab.pbworks.com/f/bfield.pdf" ). As I'd like to rotate and shift the position of the current loop I tried to transform the expressions for the fields [tex]B_r, B_z[/tex] into cartesian coordinates but failed because i also need to transform the elliptic integrals and I don't know how to do that.

Do you think I have to derive the whole thing again (starting with the current density's in x-,y- and z-direction but now strictly in cartesian coordinates which is very tedious) or is there a way to get the wanted cartesian expression from the one's in cylindrcal coordinates which I have already written down.

Thanks for your comments !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would instead express the field in spherical coordinates (see Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics, or everywhere on the web). Then use the spherical harmonic addition theorem for rotations, and spherical harmonic translation theorem for translations, to position your loop.

You can find these theorems in Steinborn and Ruedenberg, Rotation and Translation of...Spherical Harmonics, Advances in Quantum Chemistry, v. 7 (1979), and certainly elsewhere.
 
Thanks @marcusl. That is a pretty good idea and I going to try it now.


Yesterday, I found a paper (you can see it here: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20010038494_2001057024.pdf" ) where the current loop expressions are written down in spherical as well as cartesian coordinates. On the first page the authors claim to have derived the cartesian result from the spherical expression but I don't know how. Anybody got a clue how one could do that ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K